Genomic Variant Interpretation via Automated Knowledge Curation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current clinical sequencing workflows face challenges in efficiently interpreting DNA variants due to the complexity of increasing test volumes, large datasets, and the need for timely curation of literature, which can delay patient treatment and hinder clinical trial enrollment.

Innovation Solution

A knowledge-based system that utilizes expert-curated content and ontology to streamline variant classification, providing automated suggestions and integrating phenotype information for scalable and reproducible decision support, while enabling efficient identification of suitable patients for clinical trials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual literature curation is performed by geneticists, then variant interpretation accuracy is improved, but time delay increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariant interpretation accuracyVSAvoidtime delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated curation of literature and variant interpretation before human review. By pre-processing and organizing relevant information in advance, the system reduces the time geneticists need to spend on initial literature review while maintaining accuracy through subsequent expert validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated informatics system acts as an intermediary between raw sequence data and human geneticist review. This intermediary layer performs initial variant classification, literature search, and evidence synthesis, presenting pre-processed information to geneticists for final interpretation, thereby reducing their workload and time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual literature curation is performed by geneticists, then variant interpretation accuracy is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariant interpretation accuracyVSAvoidtest interpretation throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated curation of literature and variant interpretation before human review. By pre-processing and organizing relevant information in advance, the system reduces the time geneticists need to spend on initial literature review while maintaining accuracy through subsequent expert validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated informatics system acts as an intermediary between raw sequence data and human geneticist review. This intermediary layer performs initial variant classification, literature search, and evidence synthesis, presenting pre-processed information to geneticists for final interpretation, thereby reducing their workload and time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If test complexity increases with more genes assayed, then diagnostic capability is improved, but data interpretation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic capabilityVSAvoiddata interpretation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex interpretation task by processing variants at multiple levels: individual variant analysis, gene-level aggregation, pathway analysis, and phenotypic correlation. This hierarchical segmentation breaks down the overwhelming complexity of whole-exome or whole-genome data into manageable analytical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An automated informatics system acts as an intermediary between raw sequence data and human geneticist review. This intermediary layer performs initial variant classification, literature search, and evidence synthesis, presenting pre-processed information to geneticists for final interpretation, thereby reducing their workload and time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If manual literature review is performed, then up-to-date knowledge is incorporated, but time and resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge currencyVSAvoidcuration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated curation of literature and variant interpretation before human review. By pre-processing and organizing relevant information in advance, the system reduces the time geneticists need to spend on initial literature review while maintaining accuracy through subsequent expert validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated informatics system performs self-service by autonomously searching, retrieving, and analyzing current literature related to observed variants. The system automatically updates its knowledge base with new publications and clinical data, maintaining currency without requiring continuous manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20200279618A1Methods and systems for interpretation and reporting of sequence-based genetic tests
Publication Date: 2020.09.03 QIAGEN GMBH
  • US20200279618A1 patent drawing
  • US20200279618A1 patent drawing
  • US20200279618A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are system, method, and computer program product embodiments for aiding in the interpretation of variants observed in clinical sequencing data. An embodiment operates by receiving clinical trial enrollment criteria from a user, including but not limited to genetic targeting criteria; searching a knowledge base of patient test information received from a plurality of independent entities for patients that match the clinical trial enrollment criteria; and providing to the user search results for consented patients that match the clinical trial enrollment criteria.