Genotype Labeling via Hierarchical Hidden Markov Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assigning labels to human genotypes, such as those indicating ancestry, are inefficient and inaccurate, particularly for admixed genotypes, as they fail to correctly associate alleles with haplotypes and do not update models effectively based on assigned labels.

Innovation Solution

The system employs hidden Markov models, specifically diploid and inter-window HMMs, to accurately assign labels by comparing SNP sequences from an input sample genome to reference genomes, using diploid HMMs to build label pair probability distributions and inter-window HMMs to determine label assignments, which can be updated based on assigned labels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional labeling methods are used to assign labels to genotypes, then the process is simpler, but the accuracy is poor especially for admixed genotypes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabel assignment accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the genotype data into multiple windows along the genome and processes each window independently through separate HMMs. This segmentation allows the complex labeling problem to be divided into manageable parts while maintaining overall accuracy, especially for admixed genotypes where different regions may have different ancestral origins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension by building diploid HMMs from haploid HMMs, and then constructing an inter-window HMM that integrates results across multiple windows. This multi-level hierarchical structure enables accurate label assignment by combining information from different genomic regions and haplotype phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If models are updated continuously based on assigned labels, then the accuracy improves over time, but the computational resources and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabel assignment accuracyVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary model training using reference panel data before actual label assignment. The diploid and inter-window HMMs are pre-built and stored, allowing rapid label assignment without repeated model training. This preliminary action separates the computationally intensive model building phase from the efficient label assignment phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where assigned labels from new samples are used to update the reference panel and retrain the HMMs. This continuous feedback loop improves model accuracy over time by incorporating real-world data, while the incremental update approach minimizes computational overhead compared to complete retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If diploid HMMs are built from haploid HMMs and integrated through inter-window HMM, then the label assignment becomes more accurate, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveancestry identification accuracyVSAvoidHMM construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the HMM construction process into distinct hierarchical levels: haploid HMMs for individual chromosomes, diploid HMMs combining both haplotypes, and inter-window HMMs integrating multiple genomic regions. This segmentation makes the complex model construction manageable and computationally efficient at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges results from multiple haploid HMMs into diploid HMMs, and then merges diploid HMM results across windows into the inter-window HMM. This progressive merging strategy combines information from different sources systematically, improving accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency through modular integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12086735B2Local genetic ethnicity determination system
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 ANCESTRY COM DNA LLC
  • US12086735B2 patent drawing
  • US12086735B2 patent drawing
  • US12086735B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An input sample SNP genotype is divided into a plurality of windows, each including a sequence of SNPs. For each window, a diploid hidden Markov Model (HMM) is built and from a haplotype Markov Model (MM). The diploid HMM for a window is used to determine the probability that the window corresponds to a pair of labels (e.g., ethnicity labels). An inter-window HMM, with a set of states for each window, is built based on the diploid HMMs for each window. Labels are assigned to the input sample genotype based on the inter-window HMM.