Genotyping with Graph Reference Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional genotyping methods using next-generation sequencing (NGS) face limitations such as incorrect mapping of sequences absent or divergent from the reference genome, incomplete reference sequences, false variant calls due to focusing on single variant types, and inability to determine exact location or size of structural variants, as well as ignoring prior genetic variation information.

Innovation Solution

The use of genomic reference graphs structured as traversal graphs that represent diploid genotypes by connecting nodes with edges, allowing for the analysis of genetic variation across populations and identifying haploid genotypes by mapping NGS sequence reads, assigning scores, and selecting the highest-weighted path through the traversal graph.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If NGS sequence reads are mapped to a linear reference genome, then genotyping can be performed using standard approaches, but sequences absent or divergent from the reference genome cannot be correctly identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenotyping accuracyVSAvoidability to handle divergent sequences
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The linear reference genome is segmented into a graph structure where multiple paths represent different haplotypes and variants. This allows the reference to accommodate sequences absent or divergent from the canonical linear reference by providing alternative paths through the graph, resolving the contradiction between standard genotyping accuracy and ability to handle divergent sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reference genome is transformed from a one-dimensional linear sequence into a multi-dimensional graph structure with nodes and edges representing sequences and variations. This dimensional change enables the reference to represent multiple haplotypes and divergent sequences simultaneously, improving both genotyping accuracy and adaptability to divergent sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If reference sequences are used for mapping, then genotyping can be performed, but reference sequences are often incomplete in telomeric and pericentromeric regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenotyping throughputVSAvoidreference sequence completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The graph reference structure serves multiple functions: it represents complete reference sequences, incorporates alternative haplotypes, and fills gaps in incomplete regions through multiple paths. This multi-functionality allows the reference to maintain high productivity for genotyping while compensating for incomplete reference sequences in telomeric and pericentromeric regions through alternative pathways in the graph.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If mapping methods focus on a single variant type, then analysis is simplified, but incorrect alignment occurs around indel polymorphisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis simplicityVSAvoidalignment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The graph reference structure dynamically adapts to different variant types through its multi-path architecture. When sequence reads are mapped, the graph structure allows flexible alignment across multiple paths representing different haplotypes and variants. This dynamic capability maintains analysis simplicity while improving alignment accuracy around indel polymorphisms by automatically selecting appropriate paths based on the read data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If NGS mapping approaches are used, then genotyping can be performed at scale, but prior information about genetic variation within the species is ignored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenotyping throughputVSAvoidprior genetic variation information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The graph reference structure is pre-constructed by incorporating prior information about genetic variation within the species before actual genotyping analysis. Multiple paths representing known haplotypes and variants are established in advance, allowing the system to leverage prior genetic variation information during mapping while maintaining high productivity through efficient graph traversal algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10262102B2Systems and methods for genotyping with graph reference
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 SEVEN BRIDGES GENOMICS INC
  • US10262102B2 patent drawing
  • US10262102B2 patent drawing
  • US10262102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Genomic references are structured as a reference graph that represents diploid genotypes in organisms. A path through a series of connected nodes and edges represents a genetic sequence. Genetic variation within a diploid organism is represented by multiple paths through the reference graph. The graph may be transformed into a traversal graph in which a path represents a diploid genotype. Genetic analysis using the traversal graph allows an organism's diploid genotype to be elucidated, e.g., by mapping sequence reads to the reference graph and scoring paths in the traversal graph based on the mapping to determine the path through the traversal graph that best fits the sequence reads.