Geo-Referenced Map Creation with AI Grid Intersection Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual process of identifying ground control points (GCPs) on visual flight rule (VFR) charts is labor-intensive, subjective, and error-prone, leading to inconsistencies and inaccuracies in geo-referencing maps.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that automatically determine the locations of actual lines of longitude and latitude, and their intersections, using AI or machine-learning systems to analyze vast amounts of data and identify actual intersections, thereby creating geo-referenced maps with real-world coordinates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual review of VFR charts is used to locate ground control points, then flexibility in handling different chart types is maintained, but labor intensity increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling different chart typesVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of reviewing and marking ground control points with an automated image processing system. The system automatically detects chart features, identifies ground control point locations, and performs geo-referencing operations without human intervention, thereby increasing productivity while maintaining adaptability through configurable detection algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically processing VFR charts, detecting features, and generating geo-referenced maps without requiring operator intervention. The automated algorithm independently completes the entire geo-referencing workflow, eliminating the need for manual review while maintaining accuracy through built-in validation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual selection of ground control points is performed, then operator judgment can be applied to difficult cases, but measurement precision decreases due to subjectivity and inconsistencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator judgment for difficult casesVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detected ground control points are validated against multiple reference sources and previous detections. The algorithm iteratively refines its measurements by comparing detected features against known geographic coordinates and adjusting its identification criteria, thereby achieving high measurement precision while handling difficult cases through learned patterns from feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes detection parameters dynamically based on chart complexity and difficulty level. When encountering difficult cases, the algorithm automatically adjusts its feature detection sensitivity, zoom level, and matching criteria to optimize precision. This parameter adaptation allows the system to maintain high measurement precision across varying chart types and difficulties without requiring operator intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual marking of ground control points is performed, then flexibility in handling edge cases is maintained, but error rate increases due to human fatigue and subjectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling edge casesVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual marking operations with automated image processing that systematically identifies ground control points using consistent algorithms. The system processes every feature uniformly through programmed criteria, eliminating human fatigue and subjectivity that lead to errors. Edge cases are handled through configurable detection rules that can be adjusted without human intervention, maintaining flexibility while reducing error rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If automated detection of ground control points is implemented, then productivity increases and consistency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex geo-referencing task into distinct functional modules: image processing, feature detection, ground control point identification, coordinate transformation, and map generation. Each module handles a specific sub-function independently, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable. This segmentation allows high productivity through automation while keeping device complexity organized and controlled through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250271278A1Systems and methods for creating geo-referenced maps
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 THE BOEING CO
  • US20250271278A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271278A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271278A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method include identifying characteristics of a map of a geographic location, and placing plural first lines of longitude and plural first lines of latitude of the map based in part on the characteristics. The first lines of longitude and latitude intersect with each other to create plural theoretical intersections. A magnification of a segment of the map, that includes the first theoretical intersection, is changed. One or more edges associated with one or more second lines of longitude or latitude are identified, and a location of a first actual intersection within the first segment is determined based in part on the identification of the one or more edges associated with the second lines of longitude and latitude.