Geofence Transport Sealing via Electronic Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for securing cargo containers during transportation are inefficient, as traditional locks introduce logistical friction and do not provide evidence of tampering or unauthorized access, increasing the risk of theft and unauthorized access.

Innovation Solution

An electronic seal system that uses a detachable sealing shackle with memory devices and a microcontroller to authenticate the shackle, allowing conditional unsealing based on location and geofencing, ensuring secure and monitored access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional padlocks are used to secure cargo containers, then security against theft is improved, but logistical friction increases due to key sharing and physical presentation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidlogistical friction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical padlock and key system with an electronic seal system that uses electronic authentication and geofencing technology. The seal includes a microcontroller that communicates with a remote server via wireless communication, eliminating the need for physical key exchange and manual lock manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a remote server as an intermediary between the seal and the authorization process. The server stores authentication credentials and manages geofence definitions, acting as a central mediator that eliminates the need for direct key sharing between parties while maintaining security control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional padlocks are used to secure cargo containers, then security against theft is improved, but time and cost increase due to cutting locks when keys are lost or combinations forgotten

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidaccess time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic seal system replaces mechanical locks with an electronic authentication system that can be remotely opened or expired through software commands, eliminating the need for physical lock cutting when access issues arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures multiple authentication methods and emergency access procedures in advance. The seal can be remotely expired or re-authenticated before actual access problems occur, preventing the need for time-consuming lock cutting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If traditional padlocks are used to secure cargo containers, then basic security is provided, but evidence of tampering or unauthorized access is not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtampering evidence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic seal continuously monitors its state and environmental conditions, providing real-time feedback to the remote server. The system logs authentication events, geofence violations, and tampering attempts, creating an auditable trail of all seal interactions and cargo access events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The remote server acts as an intermediary that collects, stores, and analyzes security event data from the seal. This centralized data repository provides comprehensive information about tampering attempts and unauthorized access that would be impossible to capture with traditional mechanical locks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If seals are applied at every stop to provide security, then security coverage is improved, but operational efficiency decreases due to repeated unsealing and resealing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic seal dynamically adjusts its security state based on location and authorization. The seal remains electronically secured during transit but can be remotely opened or expired at authorized stops without physical removal, allowing continuous security monitoring while enabling efficient operations at designated locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-authorizes specific stops and locations where the seal can be opened or expired. By preparing the authentication credentials and geofence definitions in advance, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming re-authentication at each stop while maintaining security coverage throughout the journey.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10950147B1Geofence transport sealing
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10950147B1 patent drawing
  • US10950147B1 patent drawing
  • US10950147B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Features are disclosed for sealing system which is dynamically activated based on a vehicle's location within a geofence via a custom access application. Mobile application features are provided to securely adjust the seal state. Requests to change state are verified against location permissions indicating time or place where the seal may be disabled. The requests may also include specific a code known only to system users for authenticating requests.