Geofence Network Mapping With IPv6 Location Binding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing geo-routing and geo-casting protocols fail to accurately link network topologies to geographical locations, leading to misconfigurations and inefficiencies, especially in network management and location-based services.

Innovation Solution

A space-network model that binds Internet Protocol (IP) addresses to physical locations using a directed graph, topological space, and geodetic system, enabling precise mapping of devices and networks through a SNM-based network protocol, allowing devices to automatically determine and refine their locations and those of peers using beacon-based location services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing geo-routing and geo-casting protocols are used to link network topologies to geographical locations, then network management can be performed, but the linking accuracy is insufficient leading to misconfigurations and inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation mapping accuracyVSAvoidnetwork configuration reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the location mapping process into multiple hierarchical levels (geofences, network topologies, device locations) rather than using a single flat protocol. This segmentation allows each layer to be configured and validated independently, improving both accuracy and reliability of the overall network-location linkage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary space-network model that acts as a mediator between network topologies and geographical locations. This intermediary layer binds IP addresses to physical locations through structured geofence definitions, eliminating the direct but inaccurate linking attempted by existing protocols and providing a reliable conversion mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If GPS is used for location determination, then location accuracy is improved, but the system fails to operate in the absence of GPS

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation determination accuracyVSAvoidoperational environment flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The space-network model serves as an intermediary system that can operate independently of GPS. It provides location determination through alternative mechanisms such as Wi-Fi positioning, cellular tower triangulation, and inertial navigation, translating these alternative data sources into accurate location information within the geofence framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for location determination by not relying exclusively on GPS satellite data. Instead, it accepts multiple input parameter types (signal strengths, tower IDs, Wi-Fi MAC addresses) and processes them through the space-network model to achieve accurate location fixing in environments where GPS is unavailable or unreliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If a detailed space-network model binding IP addresses to physical locations is implemented, then location mapping precision is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation mapping precisionVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex space-network model is segmented into manageable components: geofence definitions, topology bindings, and device location tracking. Each component can be configured and maintained independently, reducing the operational complexity despite the high precision capabilities of the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal space-network model that serves multiple functions simultaneously: location mapping, network management, security policy enforcement, and routing optimization. This multi-functionality justifies the initial setup complexity by providing comprehensive solutions across multiple operational domains through a single integrated framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260006404A1Systems, methods and apparatus for geofence networks
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 GEOFRENZY
  • US20260006404A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006404A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006404A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for enforcing at least one rule associated with a geofence. At least one device is constructed and configured in network communication with a server platform and a database. The server platform defines at least one geofence for a region of interest and specifies at least one rule associated with the at least one geofence, thereby creating a rule-space model for the region of interest. The at least one geofence comprises a multiplicity of geographic designators with each geographic designator assigned with a unique IPv6 address. The at least one device receives at least one notification signal regarding the at least one rule from the at least one server platform and implements the at least one rule when the at least one device is within a predetermined distance from the at least one geofence for the region of interest.