Geographically Distributed Backup Instances for Low-Latency Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centralized backup systems for geographically dispersed client locations face inefficiencies due to high latency and bandwidth issues, leading to suboptimal resource utilization and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A geographically dispersed backup system with dynamic resource allocation and load balancing, utilizing AI to deploy CBS instances proximate to client devices, power down underutilized instances, and replicate backups based on usage patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized backup system is used for geographically dispersed clients, then data protection services can be provided to all clients, but latency and bandwidth issues occur leading to suboptimal resource utilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protection service availabilityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized backup system is segmented into multiple geographically distributed CBS instances, each serving specific regional clients. This segmentation reduces latency by placing backup services closer to clients while maintaining centralized coordination for data consistency and resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single centralized location to a multi-dimensional geographic distribution of CBS instances. Clients are served by nearby instances in their geographic region, reducing network latency while the centralized coordinator manages cross-region data consistency and resource optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If CBS instances are deployed in multiple geographic locations, then latency is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple geographically distributed CBS instances are merged under a single centralized coordinator that manages instance deployment, resource allocation, and data consistency. This merging approach simplifies the overall system architecture by providing centralized control while maintaining the performance benefits of distributed instances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized coordinator continuously monitors the performance and resource utilization of distributed CBS instances, using feedback mechanisms to dynamically adjust instance deployment and resource allocation. This feedback loop simplifies management by automatically optimizing the distributed system based on real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If CBS instances are continuously running to ensure availability, then service reliability is maintained, but resource utilization becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic resource allocation where CBS instances can be started, stopped, or scaled based on real-time demand. The centralized coordinator monitors usage patterns and dynamically adjusts instance availability, ensuring service reliability when needed while optimizing resource utilization by shutting down underutilized instances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of CBS instances based on demand conditions. Instances can transition between different states (active, standby, suspended) and their resource allocation parameters are dynamically adjusted according to usage patterns, maintaining reliability while improving overall resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If backups are replicated across multiple CBS instances, then data redundancy is improved, but bandwidth consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata redundancyVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Data redundancy is implemented with local quality, where each CBS instance stores backups primarily for its local clients. The centralized coordinator manages selective replication, ensuring that data is replicated to appropriate regional instances based on client location and access patterns, reducing unnecessary bandwidth consumption while maintaining adequate redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of fully replicating all backups to all CBS instances, the system implements partial replication based on actual needs. The centralized coordinator determines which backups should be replicated to which instances based on client distribution and access patterns, reducing bandwidth consumption while maintaining sufficient redundancy for disaster recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250335311A1Geographically dispersed backup and recovery system with dynamic resource allocation and load balancing
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250335311A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335311A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335311A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing data protection includes monitoring, by a data protection service, data protection requests issued by a set of client devices to obtain telemetry data, wherein the set of client devices are associated with a geographic location, performing a resource analysis on the telemetry data to determine a centralized backup system (CBS) instance allocation for a CBS instance in the geographic location, making a determination, based on the resource analysis, that the CBS instance is to be instantiated in the geographic location, based on the determination, deploying the CBS instance in a production environment located in the geographic location, and initiating a replication of backup data from a CBS to the CBS instance.