Geolocation Using Confidence Metrics for Distance Measurements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing geolocation systems using electronic distance measurement technologies face challenges with variable and limited measurement ranges, errors due to environmental obstructions, and ambiguity in selecting accurate positions, especially when few anchors are available or signals are lost.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a Confidence metric to assess the trustworthiness of distance measurements and Precision to evaluate measurement accuracy, allowing for the selection of the most reliable data subset for position calculation, and using geometric conditions to choose the optimal position candidate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of stationary object

If a large number of closely positioned Anchors are deployed to extend measurement range, then measurement range is improved, but device complexity and deployment cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement rangeVSAvoidnumber of Anchors
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical deployment of numerous Anchors with a software-based solution using Confidence metrics and geometric validation to filter measurements. This substitution allows the system to achieve reliable geolocation with fewer physical Anchors by intelligently selecting and validating distance measurements through mathematical criteria rather than relying on dense anchor deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If all available distance measurements are used for position calculation, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to erroneous measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition calculation speedVSAvoidposition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes erroneous distance measurements from the calculation process by applying Confidence metrics and geometric validation criteria. Instead of using all available measurements, the system identifies and excludes measurements that fail to meet validation thresholds, thereby improving position accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency by only processing validated measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple possible mathematical solutions exist for geolocation, then adaptability is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to select correct solution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling multiple solutionsVSAvoidsolution correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through Confidence metrics that evaluate the quality of each distance measurement and each candidate position solution. The system uses geometric validation to provide feedback on whether candidate solutions are physically plausible, and Confidence values provide feedback on measurement reliability. This feedback mechanism enables the system to distinguish correct solutions from incorrect ones among multiple mathematical possibilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If filtering techniques are applied to reduce erroneous measurements, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiparameter vector calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoidfiltering algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used for filtering from complex multiparameter vector calculations to simpler Confidence metrics and geometric validation criteria. Instead of using Kalman filters that require multiple sensor parameters and complex state predictions, the system uses Confidence values derived from distance measurement quality and geometric relationships, significantly reducing computational complexity while maintaining filtering effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3844522B1Methods for geolocation using electronic distance measurement equipment
Publication Date: 2024.07.31 SECOND BRIDGE INC
  • EP3844522B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3844522B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3844522B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present invention mainly relates to methods for geolocation utilizing electronic distance measurement equipment. These methods select a small subset of available data that is most trustworthy, and then use simple mathematical treatment of said subset of data (preferably bilateration or trilateration) to compute one or more new Measured Position candidates, among which one may be chosen based on Confidence metrics, relative Position geometry, and the comparison with history-based Predicted Position and its respective Confidence metric. In a case where no Measured Position candidates of sufficient Confidence are available, the Predicted Position is taken as the new Position.