Geolocation Cross-Reference for Internet User Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for authenticating internet user identity over the internet are inadequate in preventing fraud, as they do not effectively verify the geographical location of users, leading to potential identity theft during online transactions.

Innovation Solution

A method that cross-references and compares the geographical location of an internet user's IP address with their communication voice device's location, using existing software and technologies like GPS, WiMax, and cellular base stations, to assign a proximity score that determines access levels and requires additional authentication if necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication methods are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability of user identity verification deteriorates due to inability to prevent identity theft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser identity verificationVSAvoidauthentication process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a new dimension for authentication by comparing geographical locations (spatial dimension) in addition to traditional credentials. The system traces the geographical location of the IP address and compares it with the geographical location of the communication voice device, adding a spatial verification layer that prevents identity theft without significantly complicating the user experience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses geographical location data as an intermediary to verify user identity. By obtaining location information from multiple independent sources (IP address tracing and communication device location) and comparing them, the system creates a mediator verification mechanism that enhances reliability while maintaining operational ease

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If geographical location verification is implemented, then reliability of authentication is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple location tracing systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidlocation tracing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages existing multi-functional technologies that can serve both their primary purposes and geographical location tracing. Communication voice devices used for voice calls also provide location data, and IP address systems used for network routing also enable geographical tracing, thereby reducing the need for dedicated complex location tracing infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes self-service capabilities where the communication voice device and IP address infrastructure automatically provide location information without requiring additional dedicated hardware or complex external systems. The existing devices and networks serve their primary functions while simultaneously providing the location data needed for authentication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10554645B2Method for authenticating internet users
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 SPRIV LLC
  • US10554645B2 patent drawing
  • US10554645B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for authenticating an Internet user identity by cross-referencing and comparing at least two independent sources of information. A first geographical location of a computer signature of an internet user is identified, and the geographical location of a communication voice device of said internet user is identified to determine a second location. The first and second locations are compared for geographical proximity to confirm the identity of the internet user. Based upon geographical proximity of said locations, a score may be assigned to the internet user, and access to a website or authorization to carry out a transaction may be allowed or limited based upon said score. Alternatively, additional authentication information can be required or access can be terminated.