Geolocation Security Policy for Dynamic Privacy Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing geotagging systems lack granular and dynamic privacy protection for geolocation information, forcing users to either enable or disable geolocation tagging on a global basis, which does not allow for selective and automatic protection of location data.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that receives a geolocation security policy defining areas where access to geolocation information is limited, detects the device's location, and applies the policy to determine if it matches the protected area, performing security actions such as disabling geolocation recording or reducing accuracy to obscure the user's location.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If users manually disable geotagging globally, then privacy protection is improved, but the ability to benefit from geotagging features is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy riskVSAvoidgeotagging functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the geolocation protection mechanism into granular components: individual geographic areas are segmented and defined separately, each with its own security policy. This allows users to protect specific locations (home, workplace) while allowing geotagging in other areas, resolving the contradiction between global privacy protection and localized functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements location-specific privacy policies where different security rules apply to different geographic areas. Users can designate certain areas as protected zones with restricted access to geolocation information, while maintaining normal geotagging functionality in unprotected areas, thus achieving both privacy protection and functional versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If geolocation information is always protected, then privacy is improved, but the usefulness of geotagging is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy exposureVSAvoidgeotagging utility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts geolocation protection based on the device's current location and the defined security policies. When the device enters a protected area, privacy protection is automatically activated; when outside protected areas, normal geotagging functionality resumes. This dynamic behavior ensures privacy is protected only when necessary, maintaining geotagging utility elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the device's geolocation and compares it against defined protected areas, automatically applying or lifting security restrictions based on this feedback. This real-time feedback mechanism ensures that privacy protection is applied contextually, preserving geotagging usefulness in non-protected areas while protecting privacy in sensitive locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If geolocation accuracy is reduced to protect privacy, then privacy protection is improved, but location precision is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation privacyVSAvoidgeolocation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies differential accuracy treatment based on location: in protected areas, geolocation accuracy is reduced to prevent precise identification of sensitive locations, while outside protected areas, full accuracy is maintained. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by sacrificing precision only where privacy protection is required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11146537B1Systems and methods for protecting geolocation information
Publication Date: 2021.10.12 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • US11146537B1 patent drawing
  • US11146537B1 patent drawing
  • US11146537B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed computer-implemented method for protecting geolocation information may include (i) receiving, by a computing device, a geolocation security policy that defines an area in which access to geolocation information by applications will be at least partially limited to protect the privacy of a user, (ii) detecting, by the computing device, a geolocation of the computing device, (iii) applying, by the computing device, the geolocation security policy to the detected geolocation to determine whether the detected geolocation matches the area in which access to geolocation information by the applications will be at least partially limited, and (iv) performing, by the computing device, a security action to protect the privacy of the user based on determining that the detected geolocation matches the area. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.