Geolocation-Based Wagering Mode Switch for Legal Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in continuing to make wagers while traveling to jurisdictions where their usual form of gambling is illegal, and there is a need to promote safe, responsible gambling practices to prevent addiction.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using geolocation data to determine if cash value wagering is prohibited in a user's jurisdiction, switching the wagering network to non-cash value wagering if prohibited, and utilizing a jurisdiction database and mode switch module to enforce these changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If cash value wagering is allowed in all jurisdictions, then user convenience and wagering freedom are improved, but compliance with local laws deteriorates and legal risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewagering freedomVSAvoidlegal compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts wagering modes based on real-time geolocation data. The mode switch module automatically transitions between cash value wagering mode and non-cash value wagering mode depending on the detected jurisdiction, making the system adaptive to different legal environments without user intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives geolocation data from the wagering device, compares it against jurisdictional law databases, and uses this feedback loop to determine the appropriate wagering mode. This closed-loop control ensures ongoing compliance as users move between jurisdictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system switches to non-cash value wagering in prohibited jurisdictions, then legal compliance is improved, but user wagering options and flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelegal complianceVSAvoidwagering options
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different wagering modes to different geographical locations. Cash value wagering is enabled in jurisdictions where it is legal, while non-cash value wagering is used in jurisdictions where it is prohibited, allowing the system to optimize for both compliance and user preference in each local context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The wagering device is designed to perform multiple functions: it can operate in both cash value wagering mode and non-cash value wagering mode. This multi-functionality allows the single device to serve users across different jurisdictions with varying legal requirements without needing separate devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If geolocation tracking and mode switching are implemented, then legal compliance and responsible gambling are improved, but system complexity and processing requirements deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsible gambling enforcementVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mode switch module acts as an intermediary component that receives geolocation data, determines the appropriate wagering mode based on jurisdictional laws, and switches the wagering device between modes. This dedicated intermediary simplifies the overall system architecture by centralizing the compliance logic in a single module rather than distributing it throughout the entire system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11804100B2Wagering network using geolocation
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 ADRENALINE IP
  • US11804100B2 patent drawing
  • US11804100B2 patent drawing
  • US11804100B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of disabling cash wagering in a play-by-play sports betting system based on regulations and or user behavior. A user may wager on individual plays inside of a live sporting event. Those wagers may be made for points, or other non-cash equivalents, in jurisdictions in which sports wagering is not allowed or as a means of ensuring responsible gaming.