Geological Database Signatures for Hydrocarbon Exploration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydrocarbon exploration faces challenges in quickly and accurately identifying analogous subterranean formations due to incomplete subsurface information and the computational intensity of multi-parameter searches in geological databases, leading to biased selection and inefficient modeling.

Innovation Solution

A contextual geological database is configured to use parameter spaces or signatures extracted from geological features of interest, allowing for automated or manual identification of analogous formations through unsupervised machine learning, leveraging parameters such as wave energy, subsidence rates, and eustasy to generate robust subsurface models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multi-parameter search is performed to identify analogous formations, then matching accuracy is improved, but search time and computational demand increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoidsearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the formation description into discrete standardized elements (lithology, porosity, permeability, saturation, etc.) that can be independently compared. This segmentation allows the search algorithm to efficiently evaluate multiple parameters without treating them as a monolithic complex comparison, thereby reducing computational overhead while maintaining matching accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms geological parameters into standardized quantitative formats with defined units and ranges. By normalizing parameters such as porosity (volume fraction), permeability (Darcy units), and saturation (fraction), the system enables efficient algorithmic comparison across diverse data sources without losing geological nuance, thus improving search speed while preserving matching precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive geological data is collected for accurate formation comparison, then model reliability is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal data framework that handles multiple types of geological parameters (lithological, petrophysical, geometric, fluid properties) through a single standardized element structure. This multi-functional framework eliminates the need for separate processing pipelines for different data types, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive data analysis for reliable modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses template-based formation models that capture essential geological structures and properties. These templates serve as reusable copies that can be instantiated with specific parameter values from different formations, allowing accurate comparisons without reprocessing entire datasets each time, thus reducing processing complexity while maintaining model reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If detailed formation parameters are used for searching, then analogy accuracy is improved, but database search efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalogy accuracyVSAvoidsearch efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary indexing of formation parameters during data entry, organizing geological data into standardized elements with pre-computed characteristics. This preliminary structuring allows the search algorithm to quickly retrieve and compare relevant parameters without processing raw data during the actual search, thereby maintaining high analogy accuracy while improving search efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential comparison parameters (lithology type, porosity range, permeability range, saturation values) from comprehensive formation data during the search process. By selectively extracting relevant elements rather than comparing all available data, the system maintains analogy accuracy for critical parameters while reducing the computational burden of the search operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11762888B2Geological database management using signatures for hydrocarbon exploration
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP
  • US11762888B2 patent drawing
  • US11762888B2 patent drawing
  • US11762888B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is described for determining an analogue geological feature. The system may include a processor and a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that are executable by the processor to cause the processor to perform various operations. The system may generate, by extracting parameter signatures for geological features, a database including parameters about geological features associated with parameter signatures. The system may receive data including parameters and a feature-type about a geological feature of interest. The system may generate a signature including values for a subset of the feature-of-interest parameters selected based on the geological feature of interest for the feature-of-interest using the data. The system may execute a comparison of the feature signature to the parameter signatures included in the database for identifying an analogue geological feature for the feature of interest. The system may output a subset of parameters for the analogue for use in subterranean exploration.