Geometric Ceramic Armor Elements Attenuate Shock Waves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ceramic armor materials fail when subjected to projectile impact due to the destructive interaction of incident and reflected shock waves, which are concentrated in evenly thick ceramic tiles, leading to internal failure.

Innovation Solution

The use of geometrically uneven ceramic elements with non-parallel front and back surfaces, featuring inventive textures and shapes that attenuate the interaction between incident and reflected shock waves, reducing the likelihood of fracture by diverging their spatial and temporal coincidence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If evenly thick ceramic tiles are used, then manufacturing is simple and structural integrity is maintained, but shock waves reflect and interact destructively causing internal failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to shock wave interactionVSAvoidceramic element geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by providing ceramic elements with non-parallel front and back surfaces, where the first surface has a different orientation relative to the shock wave than the second surface. This asymmetric geometry causes reflected shock waves to diverge in different directions rather than converging, thereby reducing the destructive interaction between incident and reflected shock waves that occurs in symmetric, evenly thick tiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs curvature by providing at least one of the ceramic element surfaces with a curved configuration rather than a flat plane. This curved surface geometry alters the reflection pattern of shock waves, causing them to diverge more effectively and reducing the concentration of shock wave energy that leads to internal failure in conventional flat-tiled armor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Strength

If geometrically uneven ceramic elements are used, then shock wave interaction is attenuated and fracture is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to fractureVSAvoidceramic element fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric surface orientation is implemented through controlled removal or addition of material during manufacturing processes such as grinding, machining, or 3D printing. The degree of asymmetry can be adjusted to balance protective performance with manufacturability, allowing gradual transition from conventional symmetric tiles to asymmetric geometric elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Curved surfaces are created through conventional manufacturing techniques including grinding, polishing, or additive manufacturing with curved toolpaths. The curvature radius and surface profile can be optimized to provide shock wave attenuation while remaining compatible with existing manufacturing capabilities, thereby reducing the ease-of-manufacture penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If non-parallel surfaces are provided, then shock wave propagation is controlled and intensity is reduced, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock wave intensityVSAvoidsurface configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The non-parallel asymmetric surfaces are designed with specific angular relationships that optimize shock wave divergence. By controlling the angle between the front and back surfaces, the patent achieves effective shock wave intensity reduction while keeping the geometric complexity within manageable limits for manufacturing and integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Curved surfaces with optimized radius and profile are employed to control shock wave reflection and divergence. The curvature is designed to achieve maximum shock wave attenuation effect while maintaining reasonable structural complexity, avoiding excessive geometric features that would complicate manufacturing without providing additional protective benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The geometrically configured ceramic elements effectively control shock wave propagation, reducing the intensity and speed of shock waves that reach the backing layer, thereby enhancing the durability of the armor system and preventing significant fracture.

Implementation Method 1

The geometrically configured ceramic elements effectively control shock wave propagation, reducing the intensity and speed of shock waves that reach the backing layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave attenuation: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 2

conventional ceramic elements... the reflection of shock waves off of the back face of the conventional ceramic element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS8096224B2Composite armor including geometric elements for attenuating shock waves
Publication Date: 2012.01.17 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US8096224B2 patent drawing
  • US8096224B2 patent drawing
  • US8096224B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention's stratified composite material system of armor, as typically embodied, comprises a strike stratum and a backing stratum. The strike stratum includes elastomeric matrix material and inventive ceramic-inclusive elements embedded therein and arranged (e.g., in one or more rows and one or more columns) along a geometric plane corresponding to the front (initial strike) surface of the strike stratum. More rigid than the strike stratum, the backing stratum is constituted by, e.g., metallic (metal or metal alloy) material or fiber-reinforced polymeric matrix material. Some inventive embodiments also comprise a spall-containment stratum fronting the strike stratum. The inventive ceramic-inclusive elements geometrically describe any of various inventive modes, including: first mode, having a flat front face and a textured back face; second mode, having a pyramidal front section and a prismatoidal (especially, prismoidal, e.g., truncated pyramidal or prismatic) body section; hybrid mode, combining features of first and second modes.