Geometric Toy with Mating Joint Cage Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current children's toys lack a safe, stackable, and educational geometric design that can withstand play and teething, while also securely enclosing an interior toy without being easily deconstructed, and meet stringent safety standards.

Innovation Solution

A hollow rigidly deformable geometric toy with a flat side and caged silicone structure featuring a mating joint construction, utilizing silicone with a shore hardness of 50-70 for durability and safety, which securely encloses an interior toy and meets ASTM standards through a tongue and groove mating joint system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a hollow toy structure is used to make it lighter and easier to grasp, then ease of operation is improved, but structural strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of graspVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The toy is divided into multiple separate faces that form a hollow cage structure. Each face can be individually manufactured and then assembled together using mating joints, creating a lightweight yet structurally sound configuration that maintains strength while reducing overall weight and improving graspability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An interior toy is enclosed within the hollow cage formed by the faces. This nested configuration allows the exterior cage to provide structural strength and protection while the interior toy adds functional value, creating a composite structure that optimizes both strength and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a solid geometric toy is used to provide structure building benefits, then educational value is improved, but safety deteriorates due to hard corners and edges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure building benefitsVSAvoidhard corners and edges
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The solid geometric shape is segmented into a hollow cage structure with multiple faces. This segmentation removes the hard continuous corners and edges of a solid shape, replacing them with open joints and apertures that are safer for children while still maintaining the geometric form and structure-building benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the toy have different properties: the faces maintain rigid geometric shapes for structure building, while the joints and edges are designed with safety considerations. The mating joints provide connection strength without creating hard protruding corners, and apertures are positioned to avoid sharp edges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If faces are joined with simple connections to enable assembly, then ease of manufacture is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to easy disassembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly capabilityVSAvoidresistance to disassembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Mating joints with features such as tongues and grooves are pre-formed on the faces during manufacturing. This preliminary action ensures that when the faces are assembled, the joints automatically engage in the correct orientation and provide secure connections that resist disassembly while maintaining ease of manufacture through standardized joint designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The toy provides a safe, stackable, and educational play experience that exceeds safety standards by securely attaching components and preventing disassembly under normal play conditions, ensuring durability and safety for children.

Implementation Method 1

a toy body consisting of a rigidly deformable material, the toy body comprising: a plurality of faces enclosing a space... the top mating edge of the top face is securably mateable with the body mating surface by deformation of the open body edge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

utilizing silicone with a shore hardness of 50-70 for durability and safety

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShore hardness: Shore Durometer

Data Source

PatentUS10913009B2Geometric toy
Publication Date: 2021.02.09 MUNCH BABY INC
  • US10913009B2 patent drawing
  • US10913009B2 patent drawing
  • US10913009B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hollow rigidly deformable geometric toy with a flat side and a mating joint construction. The toy has a plurality of faces which form a geometric cage and a plurality of apertures, and can contain an interior toy. The geometric toy is stably constructed such that it is safe for babies and children and suitable for teething and play.