Abstract Geometrical Space for System Approximation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing system design and optimization methods face challenges in dealing with complex, nonlinear interdependencies among parameters, leading to inefficient discrete approximation of systems like filters and controllers, as naive approaches fail to account for the geometric structure of these systems.

Innovation Solution

The method involves embedding systems into an abstract geometrical space with a metric, allowing for the determination of a nearest discrete point that represents a substantially optimal discrete approximation, using techniques such as Riemannian geometry and fair sampling to reduce computational complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If naive optimization approaches are used that assume linear proximity of parameter values corresponds to linear proximity of system behaviors, then the optimization process is simple, but the approximation quality is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization process simplicityVSAvoiddiscrete approximation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the optimization problem from the original parameter space to a geometric space where systems are represented as points with defined metrics. This dimensional transformation allows the use of geometric concepts (distance, neighbors, paths) to navigate the design space, resolving the contradiction by providing both systematic structure and improved approximation quality without naive linearity assumptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the optimization approach by introducing a metric space framework where distance between systems is defined geometrically rather than through simple parameter differences. This parameter change enables accurate discrete approximation while maintaining computational tractability through geometric algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If systematic design methods based on optimization are used to handle complex interdependencies, then the approximation quality improves, but the computational complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediscrete approximation qualityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex optimization problem into geometric components: defining a metric space, identifying discrete grid points, computing geodesic paths, and finding nearest neighbors. This segmentation transforms an intractable global optimization problem into a series of manageable geometric computations, reducing computational complexity while maintaining approximation quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional optimization mechanics (gradient descent, iterative solving) with geometric mechanics (metric definitions, path finding, neighbor search). This substitution leverages the inherent geometric structure of the system space to achieve efficient computation without the iterative complexity of conventional optimization methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If discrete coefficient filter design is achieved by rounding coefficients of infinite-precision design, then the process is simple, but the frequency response quality is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign process simplicityVSAvoidfrequency response accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary geometric preparation by defining the metric space and discrete grid structure before attempting to find the optimal discrete filter. This preliminary action creates a framework that guides the search for the nearest discrete point, ensuring both simplicity and frequency response accuracy by avoiding post-hoc rounding of infinite-precision designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8364446B2Approximating a system using an abstract geometrical space
Publication Date: 2013.01.29 NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP
  • US8364446B2 patent drawing
  • US8364446B2 patent drawing
  • US8364446B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System and method for approximating a system. A multi-parameter representation of a family of systems is stored. An embedding of the family into an abstract geometrical continuous space with a metric and defined by the parameters is determined. Coordinates of the space specify values for the parameters of systems of the family. The space includes a grid of points representing respective discrete approximations of the systems. A first point corresponding to a desired instance of a system is determined. The first point's coordinates specify values for the parameters of the instance. The space is sampled using a mapping of a well-distributed point set from a Euclidean space of the parameters to the abstract space. A nearest discrete point to the first point is determined which specifies values for parameters for an optimal discrete approximation of the desired instance, which are useable to implement the discrete approximation of the desired instance.