Geometry-Aware Defect Region Prediction in Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current artificial intelligence models in manufacturing processes do not effectively incorporate product geometry data, leading to inadequate defect detection and quality prediction.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that integrates geometry data with machine learning models by computing statistical and geometrical parameters from historical and new product data, using feature engineering and geometry models to determine defect regions and optimize manufacturing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If artificial intelligence models are used to optimize process parameters and minimize defective products, then productivity and defect reduction are improved, but the models fail to incorporate crucial product geometry information leading to inadequate defect detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidgeometry information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges product geometry data with process parameters by integrating CAD model information (volumetric data, surface area, wall thickness, cooling channel geometry) into the AI model input layer. This combination allows the neural network to simultaneously process both geometric and process information, enabling accurate defect prediction that accounts for the interaction between product design and manufacturing parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional 2D process parameter space to a multi-dimensional input space that includes 3D geometric features. By incorporating volumetric measurements, surface area ratios, and spatial distribution of cooling channels, the system adds geometric dimensions to the prediction model, enabling comprehensive defect analysis that considers both process and design factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If physics-based simulations are used to optimize process and tool design, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the complexity of the system increases due to multiple simulation steps and boundary conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess optimization accuracyVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex physics-based simulation systems with an artificial neural network model. The AI model learns optimal process parameters and defect predictions from training data without requiring explicit physics equations or boundary condition specifications. This substitution maintains manufacturing precision while dramatically reducing system complexity and computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the simulation approach from solving complex differential equations with multiple boundary conditions to using a trained neural network that directly maps input parameters to output predictions. By changing the computational paradigm from physics-based calculation to data-driven prediction, the system achieves similar accuracy with significantly reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If traditional artificial intelligence models process only process parameters and sensor data, then ease of operation is maintained, but the quality prediction and defect minimization capabilities are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel operation simplicityVSAvoidquality prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing of geometry data by automatically extracting relevant features (volumetric data, surface area, wall thickness distributions, cooling channel geometry) from CAD models before input to the AI model. This pre-processing step prepares geometric information in a format ready for immediate use by the neural network, maintaining ease of operation while enhancing prediction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240004376A1System and method for determining defect regions of products in a manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 TVARIT GMBH
  • US20240004376A1 patent drawing
  • US20240004376A1 patent drawing
  • US20240004376A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for determining defect regions of products in a manufacturing process, is disclosed. The computer-implemented method includes steps of: obtaining experimental data from a machine; (b) obtaining first geometry data associated with historical products; (c) computing first geometrical parameters, based on the first geometry data associated with the historical products, by a geometry model; (d) computing second geometrical parameters, based on second geometry data associated with new products, by the geometry model; and (e) determining the defect regions in the new and historical products, based on the computed statistical features associated with defect types and locations, and the first and second geometrical parameters, by a machine learning model. The machine learning model is configured to determine the optimized recipe parameter to reduce the defect in at least one of: the new products and the historical products.