Geometry Shader Dynamic State Parameter Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current graphics processing technologies face inefficiencies in generating realistic visual effects, such as varying line thickness for anti-aliased polylines, due to fixed state parameters in the graphics pipeline, which limits the CPU's ability to dynamically adjust rendering settings, leading to suboptimal performance and visual inaccuracies.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced where a geometry processing unit determines and transmits state parameters associated with graphics primitives, allowing for flexible and efficient rendering of visual effects by setting downstream render states, enabling dynamic adjustments within the graphics pipeline without burdening the CPU with tessellation tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the CPU transmits state parameters before or after sending graphics objects, then the state parameters are fixed when rendering a particular graphics object, but this limits the ability to dynamically adjust rendering settings for visual effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adjustment of state parametersVSAvoidfixed state parameters in pipeline
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the state parameters dynamic by allowing them to be modified during shader execution rather than being fixed beforehand. The geometry shader can dynamically determine and set state parameters for downstream pipeline stages based on the specific graphics primitive being processed, enabling flexible adjustment of rendering settings without requiring CPU intervention for each parameter change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The geometry shader performs self-service by autonomously determining and setting its own downstream state parameters without CPU intervention. The shader program itself has the capability to modify render states for subsequent pipeline stages, making the system self-sufficient for dynamic parameter adjustment and eliminating the need for complex CPU-controlled parameter transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If the CPU divides graphics objects into smaller graphics objects or graphics primitives to update state parameters, then more flexibility is achieved in generating visual effects, but the CPU becomes less efficient in performing tessellation operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in generating visual effectsVSAvoidCPU tessellation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the tessellation and state parameter modification operations from the CPU and transfers them to the GPU's geometry shader. By moving these functions to the graphics processing unit, the system maintains per-primitive flexibility while eliminating the CPU performance bottleneck, as the GPU is specifically designed for parallel processing of graphics data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The geometry shader acts as an intermediary between the CPU and downstream pipeline stages. It receives graphics primitives from the CPU, processes them to determine appropriate state parameters, and then passes them along with modified render states to subsequent stages. This intermediary approach allows the CPU to maintain simplicity while achieving flexible visual effects through the shader's autonomous parameter management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the GPU performs tessellation, then overall system performance is maintained, but certain visual effects are not achievable due to limitations in changing state parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidachievable visual effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables parameter changes by allowing the geometry shader to dynamically modify state parameters for downstream pipeline stages during graphics primitive processing. This capability permits visual effects such as variable thickness anti-aliased lines and motion blur, where state parameters like line width and blending modes can be adjusted on a per-primitive basis without sacrificing GPU performance or requiring CPU intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9830741B2Setting downstream render state in an upstream shader
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 NVIDIA CORP
  • US9830741B2 patent drawing
  • US9830741B2 patent drawing
  • US9830741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed for processing graphics objects in a stage of a graphics processing pipeline. The techniques include receiving a graphics primitive associated with the graphics object, and determining a plurality of attributes corresponding to one or more vertices associated with the graphics primitive. The techniques further include determining values for one or more state parameters associated with a downstream stage of the graphics processing pipeline based on a visual effect associated with the graphics primitive. The techniques further include transmitting the state parameter values to the downstream stage of the graphics processing pipeline. One advantage of the disclosed techniques is that visual effects are flexibly and efficiently performed.