Geoscience LLM Benchmarking With Synthetic Energy Task Datasets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of comprehensive, domain-specific benchmarking datasets for evaluating the performance and reliability of large language models (LLMs) in the energy domain, making it difficult to select the best performing models for energy applications and deploying them confidently in production.

Innovation Solution

A method for creating a domain-specific benchmarking dataset by generating synthetic instruction-response pairs using text or multimodal LLMs, incorporating input data from various sources, and iteratively improving accuracy and quality based on expert feedback, to assess and compare LLMs' performance on tasks relevant to the oil and gas industry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If comprehensive domain-specific benchmarking datasets are created for evaluating LLMs in the energy domain, then model evaluation reliability is improved, but data collection and processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel evaluation reliabilityVSAvoiddata collection and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-curating high-quality domain-specific training data from multiple sources (textbooks, reports, well logs, seismic data) before evaluating LLMs. This pre-prepared benchmark dataset enables reliable model assessment without requiring complex data collection during the evaluation process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating synthetic training data and benchmark datasets that replicate real-world energy domain scenarios. Instead of collecting and processing vast amounts of actual production data, the system generates representative copies through data synthesis and augmentation techniques, simplifying the data preparation process while maintaining evaluation reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If task-specific datasets are curated to align with energy industry needs, then model performance improvement is achieved, but time and resources for data preparation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoiddata preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a multi-functional benchmarking framework that handles various energy domain tasks (seismic interpretation, well log analysis, reservoir characterization) through a unified dataset structure. This universal framework can evaluate multiple LLM capabilities simultaneously, reducing the time needed to prepare separate datasets for each task type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by transforming raw energy domain data into standardized benchmark formats with controlled parameters for task difficulty, domain specificity, and evaluation metrics. This parameterization allows efficient dataset generation and adjustment without manual reprocessing, reducing data preparation time while maintaining task-specific performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If expert feedback is incorporated to iteratively improve dataset quality, then benchmarking accuracy is enhanced, but process complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebenchmarking accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent directly applies feedback by implementing an iterative evaluation process where LLM predictions are compared against ground truth benchmark data, and performance metrics feed back into model retraining and dataset refinement. This closed-loop feedback system continuously improves benchmarking accuracy while maintaining manageable process complexity through automated evaluation pipelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If multiple data sources are integrated to create comprehensive benchmarks, then evaluation thoroughness is improved, but data integration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation thoroughnessVSAvoiddata integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies merging by integrating multiple energy domain data sources (textbooks, technical reports, well logs, seismic data, production data) into a unified benchmarking dataset. This consolidation combines diverse data types into a single comprehensive evaluation framework, improving evaluation thoroughness while reducing the complexity of managing separate data integration processes for each source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260049549A1Benchmarking and evaluation of llms for geoscience domain
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20260049549A1 patent drawing
  • US20260049549A1 patent drawing
  • US20260049549A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for creating a domain-specific benchmarking dataset for a domain-specific task in an oil and/or gas domain includes receiving input data. The method also includes receiving the domain-specific task that is related to the oil and/or gas domain. The method also includes receiving a prompt from a user. The prompt is received by a text or multimodal large language model (LLM). The method also includes generating a plurality of synthetic instruction-response pairs in response to the prompt based upon the input data and the domain-specific task. The synthetic instruction-response pairs are created by the text or multimodal LLM. The synthetic instruction-response pairs form at least part of the domain-specific benchmarking dataset.