Geospatial Feature Hashing for Consistent Road Network Maps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mapping technologies face challenges in maintaining consistency and efficiency in identifying and managing geospatial features across diverse maps, leading to navigation errors and limitations in spatial analysis and decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that uses spatial analysis and similarity analysis to assign geospatial hashes to identical features across maps, incorporating location, attributes, and temporal information, ensuring consistent representation and enabling efficient route planning and temporal tracking of road network changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional mapping technologies are used to manage geospatial features, then map generation is possible, but consistency and accuracy in identifying identical features across diverse maps deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping accuracyVSAvoidconsistency in identifying geospatial features
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the road network through graph data structures that replicate spatial and topological relationships. This virtual model allows consistent identification of geospatial features across different map versions without relying on direct geographic coordinates, thereby improving both accuracy and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between geographic coordinates and feature identification through the use of graph data structures and virtual road network models. This intermediary enables consistent feature matching across diverse maps by translating geographic references into graph-based identifiers that remain stable across time and version changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual methods are used to manage geospatial features, then detail accuracy is maintained, but processing time and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature identification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual feature identification and matching processes with automated computational algorithms that process graph data structures. The system automatically compares graph representations of road networks, identifies identical features through algorithmic analysis, and updates maps without human intervention, thereby maintaining accuracy while dramatically reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting and correcting inconsistencies in geospatial features across multiple maps. The automated algorithms independently analyze graph data, identify matching features, and update map representations without requiring manual verification or intervention, enabling rapid processing while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If diverse maps are created to represent the same area, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but complexity in managing and comparing features increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap coverageVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal graph data structure that serves multiple functions: representing the road network topology, enabling feature identification, facilitating map comparisons, and supporting version management. This single multi-functional framework handles diverse map representations without increasing complexity, as all operations reduce to graph theoretical operations on the unified structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the road network into discrete graph elements (nodes and edges) that can be independently managed and compared across different maps. This segmentation allows complex map comparisons to be broken down into simple element-by-element comparisons, reducing overall management complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage through the segmented representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12474179B2Systems and methods for identifying map geospatial features
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12474179B2 patent drawing
  • US12474179B2 patent drawing
  • US12474179B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed apparatuses and methods for identifying map geospatial features include a processor operable to extract, through spatial analysis, geospatial features from map data of a road network at a location, determine, through a similarity analysis, whether two or more of the geospatial features have an identical score beyond an identical score threshold, in response to determining that the identical score of the two or more of the geospatial features is beyond the identical score threshold, assign the shared geospatial hash to the two or more geospatial features in maps of the road network. The geospatial features include the location, geospatial attributes, topological attributes, classification attributes, and temporal information.