Geospatial Financial Benchmarking via Iterative Radius Queries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Small businesses face challenges in finding reliable financial benchmarks due to the lack of geographically relevant data and the reliance on personal knowledge of financial advisors, as conventional methods lack scalable and real-time data sets for entity attribute comparison.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize geospatial-based queries to aggregate financial attributes of companies within increasing radii to generate statistically significant benchmarks, ensuring relevant data is provided to users through a processor and memory system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional financial benchmarking methods are used relying on advisor knowledge, then peer company identification is possible, but the data reliability and geographical relevance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebenchmark data reliabilityVSAvoiddata collection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual, knowledge-based mechanical system of financial advisors with an automated computational system that uses algorithms to query, filter, and aggregate company data from multiple sources, thereby improving reliability while reducing dependence on human expertise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs multiple functions including data collection from diverse sources, geospatial filtering, financial metric comparison, and benchmark generation within a single integrated platform, enabling comprehensive benchmarking without requiring separate manual processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If publicly traded company data is used for benchmarking, then financial data availability improves, but geographical relevance and comparability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial data availabilityVSAvoidgeographical region adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies geospatial filtering to ensure that benchmark data comes from companies located in the same or similar geographical regions as the subject company, making the benchmarking data locally relevant and adaptable to regional market conditions while maintaining data availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If data filtering is performed at scale to ensure statistical significance, then benchmark accuracy improves, but computational resources and processing time worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebenchmark statistical significanceVSAvoiddata processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the data filtering process into multiple stages: initial broad data collection, geospatial filtering, financial metric filtering, and final aggregation. This segmented approach enables statistical significance to be achieved while managing computational resources efficiently through progressive refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20220327634A1Generating relevant attribute data for benchmark comparison
Publication Date: 2022.10.13 INTUIT INC
  • US20220327634A1 patent drawing
  • US20220327634A1 patent drawing
  • US20220327634A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques for generating relevant attributes data for benchmark comparison based on geospatial boundaries. According to certain embodiments, based on a geospatial-based query using the coordinates of a company, a first group of companies is found within a first radius of the company. The first group of companies is further queried based on a financial metric within a range of the same metric of the company. If the query results in a statistically significant number of companies in the first group of companies, financial attributes of each of the first group of companies are aggregated to develop a benchmark. If the query results in too few companies, a second geospatial-based query is performed at a second radius greater than the first radius. Further iterations of geospatial-based queries are performed at increasing radii until a statistically significant number of companies is found to develop a benchmark.