Geospatial Fire Hazard Rating System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fire hazard rating systems do not account for geospatial factors, leading to incomplete and unreliable assessments of fire hazards as they do not consider the varying environmental conditions and surroundings where entities are placed.

Innovation Solution

A system that determines geospatial fire hazard ratings by combining inherent fixed fire hazard values with variable fire hazard factors, using geospatial information to assign weightages to factors affecting fire hazards, and computes a comprehensive rating through a processor-driven method involving a repository, input modules, and computational units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fire hazard rating systems are used, then the rating process is simple, but the assessment is incomplete and unreliable as it does not account for geospatial factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire hazard rating accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fire hazard rating system is segmented into multiple independent modules: geospatial information acquisition module, fire hazard factor identification module, weightage allotment module, and rating computation module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the assessment, allowing the complex system to be managed through discrete, specialized components that can be developed and maintained independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a central repository as an intermediary component that stores and manages geospatial data, fire hazard factors, and pre-determined rules. This intermediary layer facilitates the interaction between various system modules, enabling them to access and process information without direct coupling, thus managing system complexity while maintaining comprehensive assessment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive geospatial factors are considered, then the fire hazard rating becomes more accurate, but the assessment process becomes more time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire hazard rating accuracyVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying and storing relevant fire hazard factors and their associated weightages in the central repository before actual assessments are conducted. Geospatial data and evaluation criteria are prepared in advance, allowing the system to quickly retrieve and apply predetermined rules during the rating process, thus reducing assessment time while maintaining comprehensive evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of information representation by using structured geospatial data formats and predefined factor categories. This parameter transformation allows the system to efficiently process and compare multiple fire hazard factors through standardized metrics, reducing the time required for comprehensive analysis while maintaining assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple fire hazard factors are evaluated, then the rating becomes more comprehensive, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire hazard assessment reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fire hazard assessment is segmented into distinct factor categories (e.g., environmental factors, structural factors, operational factors), each evaluated by specialized sub-modules. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple complex factors through organized, modular processing units, maintaining reliability while managing system complexity through structured decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The central repository serves as a universal component that stores and manages all fire hazard factors, geospatial data, and evaluation rules applicable to different entity types. This multi-functional repository enables the system to handle diverse assessment scenarios with a single unified infrastructure, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation capabilities across multiple factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9710867B2Computer implemented system and method for determining geospatial fire hazard rating of an entity
Publication Date: 2017.07.18 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US9710867B2 patent drawing
  • US9710867B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented system and method for determining geospatial fire hazard rating of an entity is envisaged. The entity represents any object, structure, or any physical article that is susceptible to fire due to its properties, placement and surrounding environment. The system of the present disclosure takes into consideration an inherent fire hazard rating value of the entity and calculates a final fire hazard rating by considering various factors based on entity's geospatial information. These factors may increase the probability of susceptibility to fire for the entity or they may be safety factors decreasing the total fire hazard rating thereby providing a safety measurement for the entity in a particular environment.