Geotag-Based Subterranean Data Management for Exploration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In oil and gas exploration, existing methods struggle to efficiently utilize large datasets and institutional knowledge, often leading to loss or inefficient use of valuable information due to ad hoc storage and lack of accessibility.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the creation of geotags associated with three-dimensional locations in a subterranean domain, linked with metadata describing the location and its features, allowing for the identification and association of analogs within a database.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If static map pins are used to represent location data, then accessibility to location information is improved, but the data rapidly becomes obsolete and loses value over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility to location informationVSAvoiddata currency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static map pins into dynamic, time-stamped geotags that automatically update when new data becomes available. Each geotag contains temporal information and can be refreshed to reflect current conditions, ensuring the data remains current while maintaining ease of access through the same intuitive map interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of location markers from static coordinates to dynamic geotags that include time stamps, data freshness indicators, and update mechanisms. This allows the same location marker to convey both historical and current information states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If ad hoc storage methods are used for institutional knowledge, then storage flexibility is improved, but data accessibility and retrieval efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage flexibilityVSAvoiddata accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments institutional knowledge into discrete, standardized geotag objects with defined metadata schemas. Each geotag is an independent, self-contained unit that can be stored flexibly in database structures while maintaining standardized access patterns through uniform query interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The geotag system creates a universal data structure that serves multiple functions: storage, retrieval, comparison, and analysis. The standardized format enables the same storage mechanism to support diverse query types and analytical operations across different datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If large datasets are stored in traditional databases, then data capacity is improved, but search and retrieval efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata capacityVSAvoidsearch and retrieval efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts key identifying features and metadata from large datasets and stores them as searchable geotag properties. This allows the system to index and search based on extracted characteristics rather than scanning entire datasets, dramatically improving retrieval efficiency while maintaining capacity for large volumes of data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw data into structured geotags with standardized parameters and metadata fields. This parameterization enables efficient indexing, filtering, and comparison operations that scale with data volume, maintaining search efficiency even as data capacity increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If explorers manually compare geological information, then analysis depth is improved, but time consumption and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis depthVSAvoidexploration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated comparison algorithms that provide feedback to explorers by identifying analogous geotags and highlighting key similarities and differences. This automated preliminary analysis preserves the depth of human expert evaluation while dramatically reducing the time required to prepare and initial comparison of geological datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12321381B2Applying geotags to images for identifying exploration opportunities
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US12321381B2 patent drawing
  • US12321381B2 patent drawing
  • US12321381B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes obtaining first data representing a subterranean domain, and creating a geotag associated with a three-dimensional location of interest in the subterranean domain and a feature at the location of interest. The geotag is further associated with second data that describes the location of interest in the subterranean domain. The method also includes generating metadata describing a portion of the first data, the second data, or both, storing the geotag in a database including a plurality of geotags. The method may also include searching for an analog to the geotag.