Gesture Control Matching for Application-Specific Display Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multifunctional image display devices face limitations in controlling applications using gestures, as existing technologies can only sense predefined gestures for a limited range of functions, restricting the versatility of gesture-based control.

Innovation Solution

An image display device equipped with a sensing unit, display unit, collection unit, and controller that can sense and match user input gestures with predefined control gesture information to execute specific events, allowing for optimized gesture control tailored to each application, including text-based and condition-based control signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single predefined gesture is used for controlling multiple functions, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability and precision of gesture control for specific applications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture control system complexityVSAvoidapplication-specific gesture control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The gesture control system is segmented into application-specific gesture sets. Each application defines its own unique gestures through the collection unit, which stores and manages multiple gesture types specific to different applications. This segmentation allows the system to maintain low overall complexity while achieving high adaptability for specific applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gesture control system dynamically adapts to different applications by selecting and executing gestures specific to the currently running application. The controller dynamically switches between different gesture sets based on the application context, enabling the system to optimize gesture control for each application without requiring a completely different system for each application type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple predefined gestures are supported for different functions, then the adaptability improves, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring specific gestures worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication-specific gesture controlVSAvoidgesture recognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The gesture detection system applies local quality by tailoring gesture recognition parameters to each specific application. Each application defines its own gesture characteristics (such as hand shape, movement trajectory, and duration) that are optimized for that particular application's control needs. This localized approach improves detection accuracy for each application while maintaining overall system adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the sensing unit continuously monitors user input and compares it against the predefined gestures for the current application. The controller provides feedback by confirming gesture recognition and executing the corresponding application-specific function, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of gesture detection for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If gesture control is enabled for all applications, then the ease of operation improves, but the loss of information increases due to ambiguous gestures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture-based control accessibilityVSAvoidgesture ambiguity between applications
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by establishing the current application context before accepting gesture input. The collection unit pre-loads and prepares the gesture definitions specific to the currently running application, ensuring that when a gesture is detected, the system immediately has the correct reference framework to interpret it unambiguously. This preliminary setup prevents gesture ambiguity while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The collection unit serves as an intermediary between the sensing unit and the controller. It acts as a mediator that manages the mapping between detected gestures and application-specific functions, ensuring that gesture information is accurately transmitted and interpreted in the correct contextual framework. This intermediary layer prevents information loss by maintaining clear gesture-application relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9600077B2Image display device and method for controlling same
Publication Date: 2017.03.21 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US9600077B2 patent drawing
  • US9600077B2 patent drawing
  • US9600077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides an image display device comprising: a sensing unit for sensing an input gesture of a user; a display unit for outputting visual information among the executed data of an application when the application is executed; a collection unit for collecting control gesture information included in the executed data; and a control unit for executing an event of the application which is included in the executed data and corresponds to the control gesture information if the control gesture information and the input gesture sensed by the sensing unit are matching while the application is executed.