Gesture Controller Origin Resetting and Power Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gesture recognition systems for controlling computing devices are costly and complex due to the need for onboard processing units, which increase power consumption and require additional calibration equipment, and can be restrictive for users who find it difficult to perform pre-set gestures.

Innovation Solution

A gesture recognition system with a motion sensor and user actuable gesture mode input that communicates with a computing device for processing and visual feedback, allowing users to redefine the controller's origin position and orientation without recalibration, and enabling personalized gesture control inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a processing unit is provided in the gesture controller to process motion sensor output, then gesture recognition functionality is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture recognition functionalityVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the processing unit from the gesture controller and relocates it to the computing device. The controller retains only the motion sensor and communication unit, while all gesture recognition processing is performed externally by the computing device's processor. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining gesture recognition functionality while eliminating the complexity and cost of an onboard processing unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a processing unit is provided in the gesture controller, then gesture recognition is enabled, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture recognition capabilityVSAvoidcontroller power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The processing unit is extracted from the controller and placed in the computing device, eliminating the power consumption associated with running a processing unit in the controller. The controller's battery only needs to power the low-power motion sensor and communication unit, significantly reducing overall power requirements and extending battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If calibration equipment is added to correct controller orientation and calibration drift, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller calibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration equipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the device's existing display and processing capabilities to provide visual feedback and calibration guidance, eliminating the need for separate calibration equipment. The processor analyzes motion sensor data and provides real-time visual feedback on the display to guide users through calibration, making the system self-calibrating using resources already present in the computing device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time visual feedback through the display unit, showing users their controller orientation and providing guidance for proper positioning during calibration. This feedback loop enables users to self-correct their orientation without needing external calibration equipment, maintaining measurement precision while avoiding additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If pre-set gestures are required for control, then system operation is simplified, but ease of operation decreases for users with difficulty performing specific gestures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to user needs by allowing customization of gestures. Users can define their own gestures that match their physical capabilities, and the system learns and adapts to individual user patterns. This dynamic adaptability maintains system simplicity while significantly improving ease of operation for users with various physical abilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows users to modify gesture parameters such as amplitude, speed, and complexity to match their capabilities. By changing these parameters, users can perform gestures that are comfortable for them while the system maintains accurate recognition and control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies the gesture controller design, reduces power consumption, and allows users to create and use personalized gestures, enhancing usability and security while reducing the complexity and cost of the system.

Implementation Method 1

a motion sensor operable to sense motion of the controller and output a signal indicative thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS11301059B2Gesture recognition system having origin resetting means
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 KANO COMPUTING
  • US11301059B2 patent drawing
  • US11301059B2 patent drawing
  • US11301059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gesture recognition system 1 comprises a gesture controller 10 and a computing device 20. The controller 10 is designed to be held by a user such that motion of the controller 10 by the user enables gesture control inputs to be made to computing device 20. In use, a display unit 28 of computing device is operable to provide visible feedback on the motion of controller 10 in the form of a cursor 31, the cursor moving in response to controller 10 motion. The system 1 is operable to enable the cursor 31 position to be reset to an origin 33 in response to a reset input. In addition to resetting the cursor 31 position, the system can define the current orientation of the controller 10 as a new origin orientation.