Gesture Identification Using 2D Imaging Size Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gesture identification methods using two-dimensional image collection units suffer from low accuracy due to the high cost of high-accuracy depth cameras and the inability to effectively distinguish between operations made within and outside a defined operating region.

Innovation Solution

A method that processes two-dimensional images to determine the imaging size of a pointing object, allowing for the identification of target images within a predetermined size range, thereby excluding operations made outside the operating region and improving accuracy by determining and executing instructions based on these target images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a high-accuracy depth camera is used to track the target and identify gestures, then the gesture identification accuracy is improved, but the device cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture identification accuracyVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a 2D image collection unit to capture images of the pointing object, then processes these 2D images to extract depth information and identify gestures. This approach copies the functionality of expensive depth cameras by using affordable 2D cameras combined with image processing algorithms, thereby achieving gesture recognition without requiring costly depth sensing hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/optical depth sensing system (depth camera) with an computational imaging approach. Instead of using specialized depth-sensing hardware, the system uses 2D image processing algorithms to infer depth information and gesture patterns, substituting physical measurement mechanisms with computational methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If a common two-dimensional image collection unit is used to identify gestures, then the device cost is reduced, but the gesture identification accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice costVSAvoidgesture identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the processing parameters of 2D images by analyzing imaging size variations of the pointing object across multiple 2D images. By extracting depth information from size changes in 2D images and processing these parameters through algorithms, the system achieves accurate gesture identification using only inexpensive 2D image collection units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts depth information (third dimension) from 2D images by analyzing the imaging size of the pointing object. This allows the system to obtain 3D gesture data from 2D images, effectively adding depth dimensionality through computational methods rather than specialized hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If all 2D images are processed for gesture identification, then comprehensive gesture detection is achieved, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture detection comprehensivenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the relevant 2D images that contain the pointing object from the sequence of 2D images, rather than processing all images. By identifying and extracting only the target images for gesture analysis, the system reduces computational workload and processing time while maintaining comprehensive gesture detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent processes only a subset of 2D images that are relevant to gesture identification (those containing the pointing object within the operating region), rather than processing the entire image sequence. This partial processing approach reduces time loss while still achieving reliable gesture detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10866649B2Gesture identification method and electronic device
Publication Date: 2020.12.15 BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
  • US10866649B2 patent drawing
  • US10866649B2 patent drawing
  • US10866649B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gesture identification method and an electronic device are provided. The gesture identification method includes: processing each 2D image of a plurality of 2D images including a pointing object, to acquire an imaging size of the pointing object in each 2D image; determining at least one target 2D image from the plurality of 2D images based on the imaging size of the pointing object in each 2D image; and determining and executing a corresponding instruction based on the at least one target 2D image.