Gesture Inference ML Model Selection for Session Variability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Biopotential gesture machine interfaces face challenges due to inter/intra-session variability, making gesture inference difficult and inaccurate, and integrating data from disparate sources such as cameras and biopotential sensors complicates the process.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that combines camera-based computer vision with biopotential sensing wearable devices, using multiple machine learning models to process and synchronize data, applying transformations to address variability and improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If biopotential gesture machine interfaces are used to classify user input, then gesture recognition capability is provided, but inter/intra-session variability makes inference difficult and reduces accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture inference reliabilityVSAvoidgesture classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data sources including biopotential sensor data, motion sensor data, and camera-based computer vision data into a unified gesture recognition system. This multi-modal fusion approach compensates for the limitations of individual sensors by leveraging complementary information from different sources, thereby improving inference reliability and accuracy despite inter-session variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts ML model parameters and selection based on session characteristics and data quality. By changing parameters such as model architecture, hyperparameters, and data weighting schemes according to session conditions, the system adapts to variability while maintaining high classification accuracy across different usage scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple data sources (cameras and biopotential sensors) are integrated, then comprehensive gesture detection is achieved, but data handling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-source data integration capabilityVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complex data processing task into separate specialized modules: one module handles biopotential sensor data processing, another handles motion sensor data, and a third handles computer vision data. Each module independently processes its specific data type using appropriate algorithms, then the results are fused at a higher level. This segmentation reduces overall system complexity by making each component more manageable and easier to optimize independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that standardizes and synchronizes data from different sources before processing. This intermediary module handles timestamp alignment, data format normalization, and coordination between disparate data streams, thereby simplifying the integration process and reducing the complexity of handling multiple data sources with different characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If ML model transformations are applied to address session variability, then gesture inference robustness is improved, but processing time and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture inference robustnessVSAvoidmodel processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and transforming ML model inputs before the main inference process. Data normalization, feature extraction, and initial filtering are conducted in advance to reduce the computational burden during actual gesture recognition. This preliminary preparation reduces processing time during critical inference moments while maintaining robustness through proper data conditioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic model selection and transformation strategies that adapt processing intensity based on session conditions. When session variability is low, simpler models with faster processing are used. When variability increases, more robust transformations are applied. This dynamic approach balances robustness and processing time by adjusting the level of transformation based on real-time conditions rather than always applying maximum processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12366923B2Systems and methods for gesture inference using ML model selection
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 PISON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12366923B2 patent drawing
  • US12366923B2 patent drawing
  • US12366923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods, systems and non-transitory computer readable memory for gesture inference. For instance, a first method may include computer vision to train and/or infer gesture inferences. For instance, a second method may include using transformations to data and/or ML models to address inter/intra-session variability of sensor data. For instance, a third method may include using ML model selection to select a ML model to address inter/intra-session variability of sensor data.