Gesture Recognition Apparatus Speed-Based Mode Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recognition apparatuses require users to manually select operation modes, leading to cumbersome gestures for switching between modes due to similarities in gestures for different modes, such as moving a mouse cursor and scrolling, which complicates intuitive operation.

Innovation Solution

A recognition apparatus that includes an acquiring unit, a calculator, a comparing unit, and a control unit to determine the moving speed of a user's hand, selecting between two recognition methods based on a threshold to differentiate between cursor movement and scrolling actions, thereby automating mode selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the same gesture is used for multiple operations (cursor movement and screen scrolling), then the gesture interface is simpler and more intuitive, but users must manually select the operation mode because the gestures are ambiguous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture intuitivenessVSAvoidmode selection requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of gesture speed to differentiate between operations. Fast hand movements are interpreted as cursor movement commands, while slow hand movements are interpreted as screen scrolling commands. This parameter-based differentiation eliminates the need for mode selection while maintaining intuitive gesture usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its interpretation of gestures based on the detected speed parameter. The recognition apparatus continuously monitors hand movement speed and switches between different recognition methods (cursor movement recognition vs. scrolling recognition) depending on whether the movement is fast or slow, enabling automatic mode switching without user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If users manually select operation modes before using gestures, then the system can provide precise control for each mode, but the operation process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation precisionVSAvoidmode selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of hand movement speed before executing the gesture operation. By pre-classifying the gesture type based on speed (fast vs. slow) before processing, the system automatically determines the operation mode in advance, eliminating the need for users to manually select modes and reducing operation time while maintaining precise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The recognition apparatus performs self-service by automatically determining the operation mode based on the detected gesture speed. The system serves itself by using the speed parameter to automatically switch between recognition methods without requiring user input for mode selection, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining operational precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If the system uses a single recognition method for all gestures, then the system is simpler to implement, but it cannot accurately distinguish between similar gestures for different operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition system simplicityVSAvoidgesture differentiation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces speed as a new parameter for gesture recognition. By incorporating speed information into the recognition process, the system can accurately differentiate between similar gestures (cursor movement vs. scrolling) that would otherwise be indistinguishable. This parameter enhancement improves measurement precision without significantly increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The recognition system is segmented into two distinct recognition methods based on speed threshold: one for fast movements (cursor operation) and one for slow movements (scrolling operation). This segmentation allows each method to be optimized for its specific gesture type, improving overall differentiation accuracy while keeping each individual method relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9405373B2Recognition apparatus
Publication Date: 2016.08.02 TOSHIBA DIGITAL SOLUTIONS CORP
  • US9405373B2 patent drawing
  • US9405373B2 patent drawing
  • US9405373B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The acquiring unit is configured to acquire positions of a particular part of a user in time series. The calculator is configured to calculate a feature value of a motion of the particular part from the positions acquired in time series. The comparing unit configured to compare the feature value and a first threshold. The recognizing unit is configured to recognize the motion of the particular part using a first recognition method and a second recognition method which is different from the first recognition method. The control unit configured to control the recognizing unit to select the first recognition method for recognizing a position or a motion of the particular part when the feature value is smaller than the first threshold, and select the second recognition method when the feature value is equal to or larger than the first threshold.