Gesture Recognition System for Contactless Symbol Entry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current human-machine interfaces, such as computers and devices, are inefficient for data entry as they rely on keyboards and mice, which are slow compared to natural human communication methods like gestures, and have not been effectively configured to recognize and process hand motions for symbol entry.

Innovation Solution

A gesture recognition system that uses an imaging system to track hand motions and recognize symbols on a display screen, allowing users to select and enter symbols without physical contact, with optional manual controller integration for flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If keyboards and mice are used for data entry, then device compatibility and reliability are maintained, but data entry speed and naturalness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata entry speedVSAvoidnaturalness of interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical input devices (keyboards and mice) with an optical imaging system that captures and processes hand gestures. The imaging system uses cameras to detect hand positions and movements, converting physical gestures into digital signals without mechanical contact, thereby increasing data entry speed and naturalness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces hand gestures as an intermediary between the user and the computer system. Instead of direct mechanical interaction with keyboards or mice, users perform natural hand movements that are captured by the imaging system and translated into commands, creating a more natural interaction bridge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If gesture recognition system is implemented, then data entry speed and naturalness are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata entry speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging system serves multiple functions: it captures images for gesture recognition, provides visual feedback by displaying hand icons on the screen, and can switch between gesture recognition mode and manual controller mode. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, managing system complexity while maintaining enhanced productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides visual feedback by displaying hand icons on the screen at locations corresponding to the user's actual hand positions. This feedback mechanism helps users understand system recognition and adjust their gestures, improving usability without requiring complex additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Area of stationary object

If symbols are displayed in small size on screen, then screen space utilization is maximized, but selection precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreen space utilizationVSAvoidsymbol selection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a temporal dimension to symbol selection by using sequential gestures. Users first perform a gross movement to select a symbol pod (coarse selection), then perform a second gesture to select the specific symbol within the pod (fine selection). This two-stage gesture process resolves the precision issue without requiring larger symbol display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the symbol selection process into two distinct stages: first selecting a symbol pod containing multiple symbols, then selecting the specific symbol within that pod. This segmentation allows symbols to remain small on screen while maintaining selection precision through the hierarchical selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If gesture recognition mode is used, then naturalness and speed are improved, but reliability and control precision may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenaturalness of interactionVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the system dynamically switchable between gesture recognition mode and manual controller mode. Users can choose the most appropriate interaction mode based on the task requirements, ensuring both naturalness (gesture mode) and control precision (manual mode) are available when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9791932B2Semaphore gesture for human-machine interface
Publication Date: 2017.10.17 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US9791932B2 patent drawing
  • US9791932B2 patent drawing
  • US9791932B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the invention provides a gesture recognition system (GRS) that displays a graphical user interface in which symbols are grouped into “pods” on a display screen, and a user enters a desired symbol into a computer by selecting a pod containing the desired symbol, and then selecting the symbol from a display of the symbols in the selected pod using hand motions without having to contact the display screen or use a manual controller.