Gesture Sensor Module Optical Isolation Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gesture sensor modules face performance degradation due to light pollution and cross-talk issues caused by the close proximity of optical emitters and sensors, which complicates miniaturization efforts.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates separate cavities for the optical emitter and sensor dies with an optical barrier in between, along with a conical opening and reflective coating to minimize light reflection and enhance optical isolation, allowing for reduced cross-talk and improved sensitivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the optical emitter and optical sensor are arranged closely together for miniaturization, then the device size is reduced, but cross-talk between the emitter and sensor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidcross-talk
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The package is divided into separate cavities - a first cavity housing the optical emitter and a second cavity housing the optical sensor. This segmentation physically separates the light source and detector, preventing direct optical coupling while maintaining compact overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A reflective coating is applied to the cavity wall between the emitter and sensor to redirect stray light away from the sensor. This intermediary surface modifies the optical path, converting harmful reflected light into useful light that exits through the optical opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If the optical emitter and optical sensor are arranged closely together, then the device complexity is reduced, but light pollution increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidlight pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity is designed with a conical opening whose width increases with distance from the emitter surface. This three-dimensional geometric feature redirects light in specific angular directions, allowing light to exit the package while preventing it from reflecting back to the sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The reflective coating is applied selectively to specific cavity surfaces where it will most effectively redirect stray light away from the sensor. This localized application optimizes light management while minimizing material usage and manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the sensor surface is positioned higher than the emitter surface, then cross-talk is reduced, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-talkVSAvoidheight alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The package structure is designed with pre-formed cavities at different heights during manufacturing. The first cavity for the emitter and second cavity for the sensor are created with predetermined height differences, eliminating the need for post-assembly height adjustment and reducing manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces cross-talk to less than 5% and increases the sensitivity of the optical sensor, while maintaining a compact package height suitable for integration into electronic devices like mobile computing and touch screens.

Implementation Method 1

an optical barrier positioned laterally between the optical emitter die and the optical sensor die

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight blocking and redirection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

the surface of the opening can be reflective. In some embodiments, the surface of the opening can be coated with a reflective metal layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS10884551B2Integrated gesture sensor module
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 ANALOG DEVICES INC
  • US10884551B2 patent drawing
  • US10884551B2 patent drawing
  • US10884551B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated gesture sensor module includes an optical sensor die, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) die, and an optical emitter die disposed in a single package. The optical sensor die and ASIC die can be disposed in a first cavity of the package, and the optical emitter die can be disposed in a second cavity of the package. The second cavity can be conical or step-shaped so that the opening defining the cavity increases with distance from the upper surface of the optical emitter die. The upper surface of the optical emitter die may be higher than the upper surface of the optical sensor die. An optical barrier positioned between the first and second cavities can include a portion of a pre-molded, laminate, or ceramic package, molding compound, and/or metallized vias.