Gimballed Thrust Unit Layout for Orientation-Independent Flight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multirotor drones are limited in maneuverability and stability due to their orientation dependency, which restricts their size and performance in various applications.

Innovation Solution

An aerial vehicle with three or more gimballed thrust units capable of two degrees of rotational freedom, allowing independent orientation and thrust control, enabled by a control unit that computes and issues commands based on sensor data to achieve hover and flight in any orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multirotor drones use fixed orientation relative to heading, then the structure is simple and easy to control, but maneuverability and stability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system is segmented into multiple independent gimballed thrust units, each capable of independent orientation control. This segmentation allows the vehicle to decouple heading from orientation, enabling each thrust unit to contribute to both propulsion and moment generation independently, thereby resolving the contradiction between control simplicity and maneuverability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The thrust units are made dynamically adjustable through gimbal mechanisms that allow real-time reorientation of each thrust vector. This dynamic capability enables the system to adapt thrust direction and magnitude independently for each unit, providing enhanced maneuverability while maintaining controllable complexity through centralized control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If multirotor drones increase size for greater stability, then stability improves, but orientation dependency limits further size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight stabilityVSAvoidorientation independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the propulsion into multiple independently controllable gimballed thrust units, the system can generate stabilizing moments without requiring a larger physical structure. Each unit can be independently oriented to counteract disturbances, providing active stability control that is independent of vehicle size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameters by independently varying the orientation and thrust magnitude of each gimballed unit. This allows the vehicle to maintain stability through active control of thrust vector parameters rather than relying on passive structural stability, enabling orientation independence regardless of size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If gimballed thrust units are added for independent orientation control, then maneuverability and precision improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each gimballed thrust unit is designed as a universal module that performs multiple functions: propulsion, orientation control, and moment generation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems for each function, thereby managing complexity while achieving enhanced maneuverability and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by changing control parameters (thrust magnitude and orientation angles) of existing gimballed units rather than adding more physical components. The control algorithm dynamically adjusts these parameters to achieve desired maneuvers, providing precision control without proportionally increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If standard multirotor design is used, then manufacturing is simple and cost-effective, but performance and precision are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidflight precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system is segmented into standardized gimballed thrust unit modules that can be manufactured using conventional processes. Each module is a self-contained unit with standardized interfaces, allowing for simplified manufacturing and assembly while enabling precise control through the gimbal mechanisms and independent actuation of each module.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11780579B2Aerial vehicle with uncoupled heading and orientation
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 VECTORED PROPULSION TECH INC
  • US11780579B2 patent drawing
  • US11780579B2 patent drawing
  • US11780579B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerial vehicle includes a hull containing the main processor, energy storage, support components such as sensors, wireless communication, and landing gear. Attached to the hull are at least three thrust or propulsion units each with two degrees of freedom from the hull allowing them to orient independently in any direction and apply thrust independently from the hull or any other thrust or propulsion unit. In some embodiments, a mount for auxiliary attachments is included or the auxiliary system is built into the hull. Components like the energy storage, auxiliary attachments, and/or propulsion units may also be replaceable as required.