GIT Image Embedding Comparison for Duplicate Event Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing capsule endoscopy procedures require clinicians to manually review thousands of images, which is time-consuming and tiresome, and there is a need for improved methods to efficiently identify and classify images containing the same or different occurrences of event indicators, such as pathologies, within the gastrointestinal tract.

Innovation Solution

A processing system utilizing a machine learning system, specifically a deep learning neural network with an embedding layer, to classify images by determining the distance between image embeddings and comparing them to a threshold to identify the same or different occurrences of event indicators, such as pathologies, without the need for an image tracker.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review of thousands of images is performed by clinicians, then accurate identification of event indicators is achieved, but time consumption and clinician fatigue increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A machine learning classification system serves as an intermediary between the image data and the clinician. The system automatically compares images using embedding distance metrics, identifies duplicate or similar event indicators, and presents filtered results to the clinician. This intermediary processing reduces the number of images requiring manual review from thousands to a manageable subset, maintaining identification accuracy while dramatically reducing review time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If machine learning classification is implemented to reduce manual review, then time consumption decreases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual process of image review with an automated machine learning system. The classification engine uses embedding-based comparison algorithms to automatically identify and group images containing the same event indicators. This substitution eliminates the need for clinicians to manually examine thousands of images, reducing review time while the modular architecture of the ML system manages complexity through standardized processing pipelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If embedding distance comparison is used to classify images, then image comparison efficiency improves, but computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomparison efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-computing and storing embedding representations for each image in the dataset. These embeddings capture the essential visual features in a compressed vector form. When comparing images, the system only needs to compute distances between pre-computed embeddings rather than performing full image analysis. This preliminary embedding step, though computationally intensive, is performed once and enables rapid subsequent comparisons, improving overall efficiency while managing computational energy through caching and reuse of embedding data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12524986B2Systems and methods for comparing distance between embedding of images to threshold to classify images as containing the same or different occurrence of event indicators
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 GIVEN IMAGING LTD
  • US12524986B2 patent drawing
  • US12524986B2 patent drawing
  • US12524986B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for determining whether two images of a gastrointestinal tract (GIT) contain the same occurrence of an event indicator or different occurrences of an event indicator. An exemplary processing system includes at least one processor and at least one memory storing instructions. When the instruction are executed by the processor(s), they cause the processing system to access a first image and a second image of a portion of a GIT, where the first image and the second image contain at least one occurrence of an event indicator, and to classify the first image and the second image by a classification system configured to provide an indication of whether the first image and second image contain a same occurrence of the event indicator or contain different occurrences of the event indicator.