GIT Image Embedding Comparison for Duplicate Event Classification
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing capsule endoscopy procedures require clinicians to manually review thousands of images, which is time-consuming and tiresome, and there is a need for improved methods to efficiently identify and classify images containing the same or different occurrences of event indicators, such as pathologies, within the gastrointestinal tract.
Innovation Solution
A processing system utilizing a machine learning system, specifically a deep learning neural network with an embedding layer, to classify images by determining the distance between image embeddings and comparing them to a threshold to identify the same or different occurrences of event indicators, such as pathologies, without the need for an image tracker.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If manual review of thousands of images is performed by clinicians, then accurate identification of event indicators is achieved, but time consumption and clinician fatigue increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
A machine learning classification system serves as an intermediary between the image data and the clinician. The system automatically compares images using embedding distance metrics, identifies duplicate or similar event indicators, and presents filtered results to the clinician. This intermediary processing reduces the number of images requiring manual review from thousands to a manageable subset, maintaining identification accuracy while dramatically reducing review time.
2Loss of time
If machine learning classification is implemented to reduce manual review, then time consumption decreases, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the mechanical/manual process of image review with an automated machine learning system. The classification engine uses embedding-based comparison algorithms to automatically identify and group images containing the same event indicators. This substitution eliminates the need for clinicians to manually examine thousands of images, reducing review time while the modular architecture of the ML system manages complexity through standardized processing pipelines.
3Productivity
If embedding distance comparison is used to classify images, then image comparison efficiency improves, but computational requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary action by pre-computing and storing embedding representations for each image in the dataset. These embeddings capture the essential visual features in a compressed vector form. When comparing images, the system only needs to compute distances between pre-computed embeddings rather than performing full image analysis. This preliminary embedding step, though computationally intensive, is performed once and enables rapid subsequent comparisons, improving overall efficiency while managing computational energy through caching and reuse of embedding data.
Data Source
AI summary
The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for determining whether two images of a gastrointestinal tract (GIT) contain the same occurrence of an event indicator or different occurrences of an event indicator. An exemplary processing system includes at least one processor and at least one memory storing instructions. When the instruction are executed by the processor(s), they cause the processing system to access a first image and a second image of a portion of a GIT, where the first image and the second image contain at least one occurrence of an event indicator, and to classify the first image and the second image by a classification system configured to provide an indication of whether the first image and second image contain a same occurrence of the event indicator or contain different occurrences of the event indicator.


