Glass Container Covert Marking for Anti-Counterfeit Traceability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current glass articles lack effective anti-counterfeiting features that are both secure and non-invasive, posing challenges in tracking and authenticating pharmaceutical products, especially in the context of high counterfeit rates in developing countries.

Innovation Solution

A glass pharmaceutical package with a delamination factor of less than or equal to 10, featuring a compressively stressed layer and an anti-counterfeit marking within the wall thickness, formed using a pulsed laser beam and ion-exchange strengthening, which is not visible through direct inspection or illumination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If overt markers are used for anti-counterfeiting, then visibility and traceability are improved, but ease of duplication by counterfeiters increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetraceabilityVSAvoidanti-counterfeiting security
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating markings with different refractive indices at specific locations within the glass article. The marking has a refractive index differing from the surrounding glass by at least 0.001, making it detectable through optical methods while remaining covert to naked eye inspection, thus providing both traceability and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes optical property changes (analogous to color changes) by creating regions with different refractive indices. These refractive index variations cause light to bend differently, creating detectable optical signatures that can be verified without visible markings, balancing traceability with anti-counterfeiting security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

2Ease of manufacture

If laser marking is performed before ion exchange, then marking formation is simplified, but glass strength and delamination resistance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking processVSAvoidglass strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing the laser marking process before the ion exchange strengthening. This sequence allows the marking to be created in the as-formed glass without compromising the subsequent ion exchange process, which then strengthens the glass around the marking region, maintaining both ease of manufacture and glass strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by controlling the laser pulse energy, pulse duration, and scanning parameters to create markings with minimal thermal damage. The laser parameters are optimized to create refractive index changes without excessive heating that would compromise the glass structure before ion exchange strengthening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If marking is placed within the compressively stressed layer, then marking durability is improved, but detection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking durabilityVSAvoidmarking detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an optical detection system as an intermediary to detect the marking. The detection system uses light refraction through the marking region, where the refractive index difference causes detectable bending of light paths. This intermediary detection method allows markings to be placed in durable locations while remaining detectable through optical measurement rather than direct visual inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Strength

If delamination factor is reduced to enhance glass integrity, then glass strength is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelamination resistanceVSAvoidsurface homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the glass composition parameters, specifically limiting Al2O3 to 5-15 mol% and SiO2 to 70-80 mol%, and controlling the ion exchange process parameters (temperature, time, salt concentration) to achieve delamination factor ≤10 while maintaining manufacturability and surface homogeneity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a secure and covert anti-counterfeiting mechanism that minimally affects the glass strength and delamination resistance, enhancing the authenticity and traceability of pharmaceutical products while deterring counterfeiting.

Implementation Method 1

focusing a pulsed laser beam at a point within a wall thickness of a body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

translating the pulsed laser beam along a scan path within the wall thickness effective to induce a change in a refractive index along the scan path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 3

ion-exchange strengthening the glass body prior to or subsequent to focusing the pulsed laser beam and translating the pulsed laser beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon exchange: Ion Exchange

Implementation Method 4

the marking is a portion of the body having a refractive index that differs from a refractive index of an unmarked portion of the body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 5

the compressively stressed layer having a surface compressive stress greater than or equal to 150MPa

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3455085B1Anti-counterfeiting measures for glass articles
Publication Date: 2021.12.01 CORNING INC
  • EP3455085B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3455085B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3455085B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A glass container including a body having a delamination factor less than or equal to 10 and at least one marking is described. The body has an inner surface, an outer surface, and a wall thickness extending between the outer surface and the inner surface. The marking is located within the wall thickness. In particular, the marking is a portion of the body having a refractive index that differs from a refractive index of an unmarked portion of the body. Methods of forming the marking within the body are also described.