Thin Glass Laminate Interval Control for Shock Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional glass sheet laminates do not adequately meet the demands for advanced properties such as shock resistance, crime prevention, heat shock resistance, translucency, and airtightness, as mere improvements in strength and thermal performance are insufficient for modern applications.

Innovation Solution

A glass sheet laminate structure is developed by laminating at least three glass sheets with a thickness of less than 1 mm through an intermediate layer, where the maximum variation in the interval between adjacent glass sheets is controlled between 0 μm and 200 μm, providing a buffer effect and enhanced adhesiveness, resulting in high strength and nonlinear elasticity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If glass sheets are laminated through an intermediate layer, then shock resistance and crime prevention performance are improved, but manufacturing precision control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock resistanceVSAvoidinterval control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the interval H between glass sheets within a specific range (0 μm to 200 μm) to optimize both shock resistance and manufacturing precision. By defining this parameter range, the patent resolves the contradiction between improving reliability through lamination and maintaining manufacturing precision, as the controlled interval ensures adequate buffer for shock absorption while remaining feasible for precise manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the interval between glass sheets is increased to provide buffer effect, then shock resistance is improved, but adhesiveness and structural stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock resistanceVSAvoidadhesiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by optimizing the interval H between glass sheets within the range of 0 μm to 200 μm. This controlled parameter change provides sufficient buffer space for shock resistance while maintaining adequate adhesiveness, resolving the contradiction between these two opposing requirements through precise parameter specification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The intermediate layer serves as a mediator between glass sheets, enabling the patent to achieve both shock resistance and adhesiveness. The intermediate layer fills the interval H between glass sheets, providing cushioning for shock absorption while maintaining structural bonding, thus resolving the contradiction between buffer effect and adhesiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Strength

If multiple glass sheets are laminated to enhance strength, then durability against external impacts is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability against external impactsVSAvoidlaminate structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the glass structure into multiple thin glass sheets (each less than 1 mm thick) laminated together. This segmentation approach enhances durability against external impacts through multiple layers while managing complexity by using standardized thin sheets with a controlled interval, making the multi-layer structure more manageable than using fewer thick sheets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure achieves excellent durability against external impacts, improved resistance to heat shocks, and maintains translucency while offering high resistance to external forces, making it suitable for various applications including building and electronic components.

Implementation Method 1

the maximum variation ΔHmax of an interval H between two adjacent glass sheets opposed to each other through the intermediate layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

an intermediate layer between two adjacent glass sheets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS8053079B2Sheet glass laminate structure and mulitiple glass laminate structure
Publication Date: 2011.11.08 NIPPON ELECTRIC GLASS CO LTD
  • US8053079B2 patent drawing
  • US8053079B2 patent drawing
  • US8053079B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A glass sheet laminate structure (10) produced by laminating at least three glass sheets (20) each having a thickness of less than 1 mm through an intermediate layer (30) between two adjacent glass sheets. The maximum variation ΔHmax of the interval H between two adjacent glass sheets opposed to each other through the intermediate layer in connection with the central portion and the opposite end portions satisfies a relationship of 0 μm<ΔHmax<200 μm.