Brittle Glass Margin Fracture Strength Testing via Curved Bending

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing two-point bending method for determining the fracture strength of thin glass sheets is inadequate as it creates an inhomogeneous stress state, is not suitable for characterizing extended sample margins, and requires complex sample preparation and instrumentation, making it unreliable and costly.

Innovation Solution

A method involving bending thin glass samples against a template with a defined curvature to apply a controlled tensile stress along the sample margin, allowing for the examination of fracture strength at specific sections without predetermined margin positions, suitable for samples of varying thickness and length, and reducing the need for complex sample preparation and instrumentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the two-point bending method is used to determine fracture strength, then the tensile stress at break can be measured, but the stress state becomes inhomogeneous along the sample making the method inadequate for characterizing extended sections of margins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile stress at break measurementVSAvoidgeneralization to extended sections
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sample margin is divided into multiple discrete test sections, each subjected to bending independently. By systematically moving the bending apparatus along the margin and testing each section, the method enables reliable characterization of extended sections while maintaining controlled stress conditions in each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bending apparatus is designed to be movable along the sample margin, dynamically adjusting the position of the bending point. This dynamic capability allows the same apparatus to test multiple sections with homogeneous stress distribution, resolving the contradiction between localized measurement precision and extended section characterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the two-point bending method is used, then fracture strength can be determined, but samples with inhomogeneous thickness cause problems that can be solved only with difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture strength determinationVSAvoidhandling inhomogeneous thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The bending method applies stress locally at the margin section being tested, rather than creating a complex global stress state. This localized approach means that thickness variations in other parts of the sample have minimal influence on the measurement, making the method naturally adaptable to samples with inhomogeneous thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the two-point bending method is used, then tensile stress at break can be measured, but the necessity of clamping places requirements on sample geometry and makes preparation tedious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile stress at break measurementVSAvoidsample preparation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping function is extracted and replaced by a bending apparatus that applies stress directly at the margin without requiring mechanical clamps. This eliminates the geometric constraints and tedious preparation associated with traditional clamping methods, while still enabling precise tensile stress measurement at the margin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If the two-point bending method is used, then fracture strength can be determined, but the cost in terms of instruments and personnel required cannot be underestimated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture strength determinationVSAvoidinstrumentation and personnel requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bending apparatus is designed as a multi-functional device that can test multiple sections along the sample margin by moving along the edge. This universal capability replaces the need for multiple specialized instruments and reduces personnel requirements, while maintaining high measurement precision for fracture strength determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides a simpler, more reliable, and cost-effective means to assess the fracture strength of glass sheet margins by applying a controlled tensile stress, enabling the examination of extended sections with homogeneous stress and minimizing the influence of sample geometry and thickness variations.

Implementation Method 1

the first lateral face is subjected to a tensile stress σ along the margin to be examined at the margin to be examined in a section of the sample by bending the sample in this section to be examined

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBending: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS9784655B2Method and apparatus for determining the fracture strength of the margins of thin sheets of brittle-fracture material
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 SCHOTT AG
  • US9784655B2 patent drawing
  • US9784655B2 patent drawing
  • US9784655B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and an apparatus for examining the fracture strength of flat samples made of brittle-fracture material are provided. The margin of the respective sample is subjected to tensile stress by bending the material in a circular arc shape.