Global Custom Machine Learning Models for Resource Impact Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Heterogeneous computing systems face challenges in understanding complex relationships between entities, leading to uninformed decisions about resource utilization changes, resulting in operational errors, latency, traffic congestion, and suboptimal performance due to computational inefficiencies and lack of collaboration among entities.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model is employed to predict impact scenarios on a structure of entities by analyzing data sets and client device criteria, facilitating collaboration and reducing computational costs through feature encoding and scenario analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If entities within a structure implement changes in resource utilization without collaboration or understanding of relationships, then decision-making speed is improved, but operational errors and performance degradation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making timeVSAvoidoperational accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification and quantification of relationships between entities before resource utilization changes are implemented. The server pre-processes data to establish relationship maps and impact models, so that when an entity proposes a resource change, the system can quickly evaluate impacts using pre-computed relationship data, reducing decision-making time while maintaining operational accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system attempts to identify and quantify relationships between all entities, then operational accuracy is improved, but computational latency and traffic congestion increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelationship understanding accuracyVSAvoidcomputational latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the computational task of relationship analysis by dividing entities into groups or clusters based on their relationships. Instead of analyzing all entity pairs globally, the server focuses computational resources on relevant segments affected by proposed resource changes. This segmentation reduces computational latency and network traffic while maintaining accuracy for impacted relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If entities make uninformed decisions about resource utilization changes, then ease of operation is improved, but system performance and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making simplicityVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The server acts as an intermediary between entities proposing resource changes and the overall system. When an entity wants to change resource utilization, the server automatically evaluates the impact using relationship data and provides feedback to the entity. This intermediary service maintains operational simplicity for entities while ensuring informed decisions that protect system performance, eliminating the need for entities to directly understand complex relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250292178A1Global predictive modeling via custom machine learning models
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 ADP INC
  • US20250292178A1 patent drawing
  • US20250292178A1 patent drawing
  • US20250292178A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Predicting impact scenarios is provided. For example, a system integrates one or more processors with a data repository. The system receives a data set including resource utilization of a structure of entities including nodes. The nodes define related entities of the structure of entities using one or more parameters correlated to the data set. The system receives a criteria defining a change in the data set. The system generates a scenario including impacts to a performance of the structure of entities. The system determines that one or more impacts are above a threshold for a first node of the nodes. The system presents the scenario including the one or more impacts to the first node. The system executes an action associated with the scenario for the structure of entities.