Global Entangling Gates for Quantum Circuit Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum circuit constructions require a large number of gates, particularly in trapped ion technology, due to the difficulty in implementing global interactions efficiently, which limits the scalability and efficiency of quantum computing.

Innovation Solution

The use of global entangling operators, such as the Mølmer-Sørensen (GMS) gate, to reduce the number of entangling gates required in quantum circuit constructions, enabling more efficient implementations of circuits like stabilizer circuits, Toffoli gates, Quantum Fourier Transformation, and Quantum Fourier Adder circuits by applying global operations instead of local two-qubit gates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If local two-qubit gates are used for quantum circuit constructions, then individual qubit control is achieved, but the number of entangling gates increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual qubit controlVSAvoidnumber of entangling gates
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple local two-qubit entangling gates into a single global entangling gate that acts on multiple qubits simultaneously. The global entangling gate applies the same entangling operation to all qubit pairs in parallel, replacing what would otherwise require O(n²) individual two-qubit gates with just one global gate, thereby dramatically reducing the total number of entangling gates while maintaining individual qubit control through subsequent single-qubit rotations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The global entangling gate serves as a universal operation that can entangle any pair of qubits in the system without requiring separate dedicated hardware for each pair. A single global gate mechanism can address all qubit pairs, making the system more versatile and reducing the overall gate count for circuits involving multiple qubits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If O(n²) individual resonators are placed for each qubit pair in superconducting circuits, then individual two-qubit interactions are enabled, but the hardware area and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual two-qubit interactionsVSAvoidhardware area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of placing O(n²) individual resonators for each qubit pair, the patent merges all qubits into a shared global resonator mode. This single resonator mediates interactions between all qubit pairs simultaneously, reducing the hardware footprint from quadratic to linear scaling while maintaining the ability to perform individual two-qubit interactions through selective addressing combined with the global interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single global resonator serves multiple functions by enabling interactions between all possible qubit pairs. Rather than requiring dedicated resonators for each pair, this universal resonator can mediate any two-qubit interaction in the system, greatly reducing the total hardware area required while preserving full connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If global entangling gates are used to reduce gate count, then circuit efficiency improves, but control precision for individual qubits may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the quantum circuit into two distinct layers: a global entangling gate layer that provides efficient parallel entanglement across all qubits, and a single-qubit rotation layer that provides precise individual qubit control. By separating these functions, the system achieves both high circuit efficiency through the global gate and maintains measurement precision through the subsequent addressable single-qubit operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by making the single-qubit rotation operations addressable and individually controllable after the global entangling gate. This allows precise control and measurement on specific qubits while the global gate handles the bulk entanglement operation, ensuring that local precision requirements are met without sacrificing overall circuit efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11562277B2Use of global interactions in efficient quantum circuit constructions
Publication Date: 2023.01.24 IONQ INC
  • US11562277B2 patent drawing
  • US11562277B2 patent drawing
  • US11562277B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes various aspects of techniques for using global interactions in efficient quantum circuit constructions. More specifically, this disclosure describes ways to use a global entangling operator to efficiently implement circuitry common to a selection of important quantum algorithms. The circuits may be constructed with global Ising entangling gates (e.g., global Mølmer-Sørenson gates or GMS gates) and arbitrary addressable single-qubit gates. Examples of the types of circuits that can be implemented include stabilizer circuits, Toffoli-4 gates, Toffoli-n gates, quantum Fourier transformation (QTF) circuits, and quantum Fourier adder (QFA) circuits. In certain instances, the use of global operations can substantially improve the entangling gate count.