Global Product Definition Representation Using Positive Logic Rule Groups

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional product configuration systems face inefficiencies and errors due to the complexity of defining and applying rules for component compatibility in complex systems, leading to increased computational demands and labor-intensive processes, making them costly and inflexible.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generates a global representation of a product definition by converting local, rule-based representations into positive logic rule groups, allowing for efficient validation of product configurations against valid end-product configurations, using binary-vector logical and algebraic operations to minimize errors and improve efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional rule-based approaches are used to define component compatibility, then product configuration validation can be performed, but computational resource consumption increases and system performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct configuration validation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-computes and stores compatibility information in lookup tables during system initialization or product definition phase. When validating a configuration, the system directly queries these pre-computed tables rather than performing complex rule evaluations, thereby eliminating runtime computational overhead while maintaining validation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified representations of compatibility rules in the form of lookup tables that capture the essential compatibility relationships. These tables serve as copies of the full rule logic, enabling fast validation by replacing complex rule-based reasoning with simple table lookups that consume minimal computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If comprehensive rules and constraints are defined for all component interrelationships, then configuration validity can be ensured, but the complexity of the system increases and error possibilities rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration validityVSAvoidrule and constraint definition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms complex rule-based representations into simplified lookup table structures. These tables capture all compatibility relationships in a compact format that is easier to define and maintain, reducing the complexity of rule definition while preserving complete validation capability through the tabular representation of all valid component combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the representation parameters of compatibility rules from complex logical expressions to simple tabular data structures. This parameter transformation converts difficult-to-manage rule definitions into straightforward lookup tables that are easier to populate, validate, and maintain, thereby reducing definition complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If inter-component compatibility rules are defined for each component, then configuration validation is possible, but the product definition process becomes labor-intensive and implementation changes become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent compatibility validationVSAvoidproduct definition process ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates centralized lookup tables that consolidate compatibility information for all components. Instead of defining and maintaining separate rules for each component, the system uses a single tabular structure that captures all inter-component relationships, significantly reducing the labor required for product definition and simplifying implementation of changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal lookup table structure that serves all component compatibility validation needs simultaneously. This single tabular representation handles compatibility checking for any number of components and relationships, eliminating the need for component-specific rule definitions and enabling easy maintenance through centralized management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9852429B2Method and system for generating a global representation of a product definition
Publication Date: 2017.12.26 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9852429B2 patent drawing
  • US9852429B2 patent drawing
  • US9852429B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method or system that receives a product definition that includes a feature family having data defining one or more product features. The product definition including one or more corresponding rules defining one or more relationships between one or more product features. The method or system receiving input selecting one or more feature families of interest. The method or system identifying the one or more rules that provide a relationship connecting the one or more feature families to the selected feature families of interest. The method or system converting the identified rules to one or more positive logic rule groups. The method or system generating one or more global representations of the product definition by interacting the one or more positive logic rule groups to produce a result that defines the relationship between the interacted positive logic rule groups and storing the results that are determined as being valid.