Glucose Alert Escalation Across Volume and Sensory Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing diabetes management devices often fail to effectively alert users of critical blood glucose level changes due to suboptimal alert volumes, leading to missed alerts in noisy environments or device malfunctions, which can result in adverse health consequences and unnecessary battery depletion.

Innovation Solution

A user device that customizes alerts based on user-specific criteria, environmental noise levels, and device status, using a combination of auditory, visual, and haptic signals, with increasing intensity and modality changes if initial alerts are not acknowledged, and alerts emergency contacts or services if necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the alert volume is increased to ensure user awareness in noisy environments, then the reliability of alert delivery is improved, but the user experience deteriorates in quiet environments where loud noises are discouraged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert delivery reliabilityVSAvoidnoise disturbance to user
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The alert system dynamically adjusts the volume level based on real-time environmental noise detection and user response patterns. The controller increases volume incrementally only when the user fails to acknowledge the alert, allowing the system to adapt to both noisy and quiet environments without causing unnecessary disturbance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the audio parameter (volume level) based on detected conditions. The controller monitors environmental noise levels and user acknowledgment status, then adjusts the alert volume parameter accordingly - increasing it in noisy environments or when the user is unresponsive, and maintaining lower levels in quiet environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the alert volume is decreased to avoid disturbance in quiet environments, then the user experience is improved, but the reliability of alert delivery deteriorates in noisy environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise disturbance to userVSAvoidalert delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the volume level based on real-time environmental noise detection and user response patterns. The controller increases volume incrementally only when the user fails to acknowledge the alert, allowing the system to adapt to both noisy and quiet environments without causing unnecessary disturbance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the audio parameter (volume level) based on detected conditions. The controller monitors environmental noise levels and user acknowledgment status, then adjusts the alert volume parameter accordingly - increasing it in noisy environments or when the user is unresponsive, and maintaining lower levels in quiet environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the alert is repeated at increasing intensity until acknowledged, then the reliability of user notification is improved, but the battery consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser notification reliabilityVSAvoidbattery consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic alert repetition with increasing intensity intervals. The controller repeats the alert at progressively higher volume levels only when the user fails to acknowledge, creating a periodic action pattern that balances notification reliability with energy conservation by avoiding continuous high-intensity alerts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the audio parameter (volume level) based on detected conditions. The controller monitors environmental noise levels and user acknowledgment status, then adjusts the alert volume parameter accordingly - increasing it in noisy environments or when the user is unresponsive, and maintaining lower levels in quiet environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the user manually adjusts the alert volume down or disables it, then the noise disturbance is reduced, but the reliability of receiving critical alerts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise disturbance to userVSAvoidalert reception reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the controller monitors user acknowledgment status and environmental conditions. When the user fails to acknowledge an alert or the environment is detected as noisy, the system automatically increases volume or changes alert modality, creating a feedback loop that maintains reliability without requiring manual user adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides self-service by automatically adapting to environmental conditions and user response patterns without requiring manual intervention. The controller autonomously adjusts alert parameters based on detected conditions, eliminating the need for users to manually configure volume settings while maintaining reliable alert delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12154427B2Medical device alert, optimization, personalization, and escalation
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 ROCHE DIABETES CARE INC
  • US12154427B2 patent drawing
  • US12154427B2 patent drawing
  • US12154427B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An alert is used to inform a user that their blood glucose level has dropped below a threshold (e.g., the user is hypoglycemic) or has increased above a threshold (e.g., the user is hyperglycemic). There is a hierarchy of alerts from lowest priority to highest priority. The alert is communicated by a user device (e.g., a mobile device), which is, for example, a smartphone, smart watch, home automation device, or the like. The alert is modified in order to increase the likelihood that the user receives or acknowledges the alert within a minimal amount of time. An intensity level (e.g., a volume) of an alert is modified based on, for example, whether the user has acknowledged a previous alert. A modality or a sensory channel of an alert is changed if an initial alert does fails to elicit a response from the user.