Hybrid Glucose Prediction Model Augmented by Physiological Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing glucose prediction models, both purely data-driven and hybrid, face challenges in sensitivity to insulin and carbohydrate intakes, particularly when trained on real-world user data from narrow treatment regions, limiting their ability to generalize outside these regions, where predictions are most critical.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that generate a software-implemented module using a combination of physiological models and machine learning, where augmented data sets are created by simulating additional input parameters to enhance training data, allowing the model to capture a wider range of physiological responses and improve prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a purely data-driven machine learning model is trained on real-world user data, then the model can be implemented with a single model type, but the model lacks sensitivity to insulin and carbohydrate intakes because the training data reflects only a narrow treatment region

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of model implementationVSAvoidsensitivity to insulin and carbohydrate intakes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges a physiological model with a machine learning model into a hybrid system. The physiological model generates synthetic training data that covers a broader range of physiological responses to insulin and carbohydrate intakes, while the machine learning model learns from this augmented data. This combination allows the system to maintain implementation simplicity while improving sensitivity and reliability in predicting glucose responses to dietary and medication inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If a hybrid approach combining physiological and machine learning models is used, then sensitivity to insulin and carbohydrate intakes is improved, but the system complexity increases due to maintaining two types of models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity to insulin and carbohydrate intakesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The physiological model is used in advance to generate synthetic training data that augments the real-world dataset. This preliminary action creates a more comprehensive training corpus that covers edge cases and broader physiological responses. The machine learning model then trains on this pre-augmented data, achieving improved sensitivity without requiring complex real-time interactions between multiple models during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The physiological model creates synthetic copies of training data by simulating various insulin and carbohydrate intake scenarios. These synthetic data copies expand the training dataset to include rare and extreme cases that would be difficult to capture in real-world data collection. The machine learning model learns from these copied scenarios, improving its sensitivity without requiring additional physical sensors or complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If training data is limited to real-world user data from normal treatment regions, then data collection is simple, but the model cannot generalize to critical situations outside the normal treatment region

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of data collectionVSAvoidgeneralization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The physiological model systematically varies key parameters such as insulin dosage, carbohydrate amount, and timing to generate synthetic training scenarios that cover a broader range of physiological conditions. This parameter exploration allows the machine learning model to learn responses to extreme and critical situations (e.g., severe hypoglycemia, large carbohydrate loads) without requiring actual collection of such rare real-world data, thereby improving generalization while keeping data collection simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230092186A1Method and system for generating a software-implemented module for determining an analyte value, computer program product, and method and system for determining an analyte value
Publication Date: 2023.03.23 F HOFFMANN LA ROCHE LTD
  • US20230092186A1 patent drawing
  • US20230092186A1 patent drawing
  • US20230092186A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating a software-implemented module for determining a glucose value in a body fluid. A first set of input data indicative of first values measured for first and a second input parameters is provided. A second set of input data indicative of second values for the first and second input parameters is also provided. The first and second sets of input data are processed by a physiological model to determine first and second sets of glucose values, respectively, in a body fluid. Training data is determined and a set of test data different from the training data is also determined. A software-implemented machine learning model configured to determine a glucose value in a body fluid of a patient is provided and is trained by the training data and is tested by the test data.