Personalized Calibration Model for Glucose Sensor Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current insulin infusion pump systems face challenges in accurately regulating blood glucose levels due to variations in individual insulin response and daily activities, as well as limitations in continuous glucose monitoring devices, leading to uncertainties and inaccuracies in glucose control.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of personalized, patient-specific parameter models that use current operational context information to calculate calibration factors for converting electrical signals into calibrated measurement values, allowing for dynamic adjustments in control schemes and improved glucose management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If continuous glucose monitoring is used to regulate blood glucose levels, then glucose regulation can be performed in a substantially continuous and autonomous manner, but variations in individual insulin response and daily activities as well as device limitations lead to uncertainties and inaccuracies in glucose control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous glucose regulationVSAvoidglucose measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes calibration factors based on operational context parameters such as sensor location, time of day, and patient activity level. By adjusting the calibration factor according to these varying parameters, the system maintains measurement accuracy despite changes in individual insulin response and daily activities, directly addressing the contradiction between autonomous operation and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If standardized calibration factors are used for glucose monitoring, then device operation is simplified, but individual variations in insulin response and operational context reduce the accuracy of glucose measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice operation simplicityVSAvoidglucose measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, standardized calibration factors to dynamic, context-dependent calibration factors. The calibration factor is automatically adjusted based on real-time operational context including sensor location, time, and patient state, maintaining ease of operation while significantly improving measurement precision for individual patients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the calibration parameter based on operational context variables. By implementing context-dependent calibration factors that adapt to individual patient variations and environmental conditions, the system resolves the contradiction between simplified operation and accurate measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If calibration factors are adjusted to account for individual variations and operational context, then glucose measurement accuracy is improved, but the complexity of the control system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglucose measurement accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically determining context-dependent calibration factors without requiring manual intervention. The device monitors its own operational context (sensor location, time, activity level) and autonomously adjusts calibration parameters, improving measurement accuracy while minimizing the increase in perceived system complexity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where glucose measurements and operational context data are continuously monitored and used to adjust calibration factors. This closed-loop approach improves measurement precision while managing system complexity through automated feedback-based parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11857765B2Personalized parameter modeling methods and related devices and systems
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 MEDTRONIC MINIMED INC
  • US11857765B2 patent drawing
  • US11857765B2 patent drawing
  • US11857765B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A processor-implemented method comprises obtaining current operational context information associated with a sensing device; obtaining an expected calibration factor parameter model associated with a patient; calculating an expected calibration factor value based on the expected calibration factor parameter model and the current operational context information; obtaining one or more electrical signals from the sensing device, the one or more electrical signals having a signal characteristic indicative of a physiological condition; converting the one or more electrical signals into a calibrated measurement value for the physiological condition using the expected calibration factor value; and outputting the calibrated measurement value for the physiological condition.