Synergistic L-Glufosinate Combinations for Resistant Bidens Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing herbicides are inadequate for effectively controlling Bidens genus weeds, which are resistant and persistent, and often result in additive or antagonistic effects, phytotoxicity to crops, and resistance development.

Innovation Solution

A synergistic herbicidal combination comprising L-glufosinate, salts, or esters, and at least one additional herbicide, such as very-long-chain fatty acid inhibitor herbicides or cellulose synthesis inhibitor herbicides, is applied to control Bidens genus weeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing herbicides are used to control Bidens genus weeds, then weed control is attempted, but the herbicides are inadequate for resistant and persistent weeds, resulting in poor control effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidcrop yield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple herbicides with different modes of action (L-glufosinate, very-long-chain fatty acid inhibitor herbicides, and cellulose synthesis inhibitor herbicides) into a synergistic combination. This merging of herbicides with complementary mechanisms allows for more effective control of resistant Bidens genus weeds compared to single herbicide applications, directly addressing the inadequacy of existing herbicides while maintaining crop safety and yield potential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If herbicide combinations are used to improve weed control, then synergistic effect is achieved, but phytotoxicity to crops occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidphytotoxicity to crops
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully adjusts the dosages and ratios of different herbicides in the combination to optimize synergistic effectiveness while minimizing phytotoxicity. By modifying the concentration parameters and application rates of each herbicide component, the formulation achieves enhanced weed control without causing harmful effects to crops, resolving the contradiction between control effectiveness and crop safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If single herbicide is applied to control weeds, then application is simple, but resistance development occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication simplicityVSAvoidresistance management
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a multi-component herbicide combination where each herbicide targets different physiological pathways in the weed (glufosinate inhibiting glutamine synthetase, VLCFA inhibitors blocking fatty acid synthesis, and cellulose synthesis inhibitors preventing cell wall formation). This merging of multiple modes of action makes it difficult for weeds to develop resistance, as simultaneous failure of multiple independent mechanisms is highly unlikely, while the combination can be applied using standard agricultural equipment and procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250351829A1Herbicidal combinations and a method for controlling undesired vegetation
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 UPL MAURITIUS LTD
  • US20250351829A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method for controlling unwanted vegetation/weeds. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a method for controlling Bidens genus weeds with synergistic herbicidal combinations comprising L-glufosinate, salts, esters, or combinations thereof and at least one additional herbicide.