Digital Glyph Overlap Correction System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for correcting digital glyph overlaps in digital documents are tedious, time-consuming, and inefficient, requiring manual review and correction of glyph properties, often leading to missed errors and suboptimal solutions.

Innovation Solution

A digital glyph overlap correction system that automatically detects overlaps, identifies the causing glyph property, and corrects them by changing relevant parameters, either through user intervention or autonomously, improving the aesthetic appeal and operational efficiency of digital documents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual review techniques are used to identify glyph overlaps, then users can detect errors, but the process becomes tedious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidtime to identify overlaps
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-detection of glyph overlaps through computational analysis of glyph positions and properties, eliminating the need for manual review while maintaining high detection accuracy. The computing device autonomously identifies overlapping glyphs by comparing their spatial coordinates and rendering boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical review process with an automated computational system that uses algorithms to detect glyph overlaps. The system substitutes human visual inspection with machine-based coordinate analysis and rendering engine queries, dramatically reducing time loss while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If users manually explore correction methods for glyph overlaps, then corrections can be made, but the process becomes error-prone and computationally inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection process simplicityVSAvoidcorrection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides automated feedback by analyzing glyph properties, identifying the specific cause of overlaps, and generating recommended corrections. This feedback loop guides users through the correction process, making it simpler and more efficient by presenting targeted solutions rather than requiring exploratory trial-and-error approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of glyph properties and overlap causes before user intervention is needed. By pre-computing the most likely causes and effective corrections, the system prepares targeted solutions that users can apply directly, eliminating the need for manual exploration and improving both ease of operation and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If conventional techniques restrict changes to one glyph property parameter at a time, then the correction process is manageable, but optimal corrections cannot be found

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection process complexityVSAvoidcorrection optimality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically evaluates multiple glyph property parameters simultaneously, allowing flexible exploration of correction options across different properties. Rather than being restricted to single-parameter changes, the system can analyze and propose coordinated adjustments to multiple parameters, finding optimal corrections that consider interactions between different glyph properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables simultaneous modification of multiple glyph property parameters to achieve optimal correction results. The system analyzes how changes in different parameters (such as kerning, leading, font size, or character spacing) interact to resolve overlaps, allowing users to apply coordinated parameter changes that produce better aesthetic and functional outcomes than sequential single-parameter adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11080464B2Correction techniques of overlapping digital glyphs
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 ADOBE INC
  • US11080464B2 patent drawing
  • US11080464B2 patent drawing
  • US11080464B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Digital glyph overlap correction system implemented as part of a computing device is described. The system is configured to improve detection and correction of overlaps of digital glyphs by detecting on overlap of digital glyphs within a digital document, determining a glyph property causing the overlap, determining a change to the parameter of the glyph property that causes the overlap, generating a correction for the overlap based on the change to the parameter, and rendering the digital document as having the correction. The digital glyph overlap correction system corrects or facilitates correction of the overlap in an efficient and seamless manner, thereby improving the aesthetic appeal of content within the digital document.