Graph Neural Network Defect Detection for Additive Melt Pools

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting defects in additively-manufactured parts, such as voids in metal parts, are either time-consuming and expensive (like CT imaging) or destructive (physical inspection), making them unsuitable for high-volume applications.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing graph neural networks to analyze in situ measurements of melt pool characteristics during the additive manufacturing process, converting these measurements into graph data, and predicting defects through supervised learning with labeled datasets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If CT imaging is used for defect detection, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary defect detection during the additive manufacturing process itself by monitoring melt pool characteristics in real-time. This allows defects to be identified before the part is completely manufactured, eliminating the need for time-consuming post-build CT imaging while maintaining detection accuracy through continuous process monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical CT imaging system with a computational approach using graph neural networks that analyze optical data (melt pool images) captured during manufacturing. This substitution of detection methodology enables real-time defect identification without the time and cost overhead of traditional CT scanning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If physical inspection is used for defect detection, then measurement precision is improved, but the article is destroyed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoiddestructive damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces destructive physical inspection methods with non-destructive optical monitoring and graph neural network analysis. By substituting mechanical/physical destruction-based detection with computational analysis of melt pool characteristics, the system achieves accurate defect detection while preserving the integrity of the manufactured part

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital replica or model of the manufacturing process through graph representations of melt pool data. This digital copy allows for virtual inspection and defect detection without physically touching or damaging the actual part, enabling repeated analysis without degradation of the inspected object

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If in situ monitoring is implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The graph neural network system serves multiple functions: it processes melt pool images, detects defects in real-time, provides feedback for process control, and generates predictions about final part quality. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a single integrated platform, managing complexity while enhancing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces graph neural networks as an intermediary layer between the physical manufacturing process and the control system. This intermediary transforms complex optical data into simplified graph representations that are easier to analyze and act upon, reducing the overall system complexity while enabling real-time monitoring and decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time, non-destructive defect prediction, allowing process halting if defects are likely, thereby saving time and material, and reducing the need for post-build inspections.

Implementation Method 1

storing a graph comprising a plurality of light intensity values measured in situ during an additive manufacturing process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight intensity measurement: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS20250341822A1In situ defect detection of additively-manufactured articles using graph neural networks
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 THE BOEING CO
  • US20250341822A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341822A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341822A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In situ defect detection of additively-manufactured articles using graph neural networks are provided. One aspect includes a computing device comprising processing circuitry and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processing circuitry, causes the processing circuitry to store a graph comprising a plurality of light intensity values measured in situ during an additive manufacturing process and to generate an output describing a predicted defect in the graph using a graph neural network, wherein the graph neural network has been trained using labeled training data generated by a process comprising storing a training graph comprising a plurality of training light intensity values measured in situ during a training additive manufacturing process of the training article, determining one or more defect locations of the training article, determining a plurality of training sub-graphs from the training graph, and pairing a training sub-graph with defect information.