GNSS Integrity Bias Impact Reduction via Statistical Protection Levels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

GNSS integrity is compromised by biases in pseudorange measurements, leading to random errors in position solutions and unnecessary limitations in provided integrity.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to calculate protection levels by approximating the impact of biases using a normal distribution, rather than relying on the worst-case combination of biases, thereby reducing the bias impact on GNSS integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the worst-case combination of biases is used to calculate protection levels, then safety is ensured, but protection levels become excessively high leading to unnecessary integrity limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidprotection level accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the calculation parameter from worst-case bias combination to standard deviation of bias, transforming the protection level calculation from a conservative static approach to a statistically-based dynamic approach that reflects actual error distributions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical worst-case combination approach with a statistical probability model, substituting deterministic bias addition with stochastic error analysis based on normal distribution assumptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If biases are calculated and combined in the worst-case scenario, then integrity monitoring is conservative, but protection levels increase unnecessarily reducing system availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrity monitoringVSAvoidsystem availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the integrity monitoring parameter from worst-case bias combination to standard deviation of bias, enabling more realistic protection level calculations that maintain safety while improving system availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of bias uncertainties into a benefit by using statistical distribution characteristics to model bias behavior, transforming conservative overestimation into realistic error bounding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Measurement precision

If standard deviation of bias is used instead of worst-case combination, then protection levels are reduced, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection level accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex worst-case combination calculations with simpler standard deviation computations based on normal distribution assumptions, reducing computational burden while improving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3730971B1Reducing bias impact on GNSS integrity
Publication Date: 2025.06.04 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP3730971B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3730971B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3730971B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods for reducing bias impact on GNSS integrity are described herein. In certain embodiments, a method includes determining a phase of travel of a vehicle. The method also includes determining a probability of hazardously misleading information (PHMI) for the corresponding phase of travel. Further, the method includes determining a protection level (PL) using based on the PHMI, wherein the PL is calculated based on a standard deviation of position error plus a standard deviation of bias along an axis of interest. Additionally, the method includes comparing the protection level against an alert limit.