GNSS Post-Processing Without Kalman Filtering for Epoch Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing GNSS post-processing techniques rely on Kalman filtering, which assumes normal distribution and independence of errors, leading to inaccurate and optimistic position solutions when the system model is complex or inconsistent, and direct combination of forward and backward solutions ignores consistency and ambiguity distinctions, degrading accuracy.

Innovation Solution

Dynamic application of multiple GNSS post-processing methods to each epoch, determining consistency between epochs and combining solutions based on shared ambiguity values to generate a more accurate combined position solution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If Kalman filtering is used to process forward and backward GNSS data, then the position solution can be generated efficiently, but the accuracy deteriorates when the system model is overly complex or inconsistent with actual state variables

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidposition solution accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the processing into multiple independent post-processing methods (e.g., precise point positioning, differential GNSS, carrier phase ambiguity resolution) rather than relying on a single Kalman filter. Each method processes the GNSS data independently, allowing selection of the most appropriate method for each epoch based on data quality and consistency, thereby maintaining accuracy without sacrificing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically selects and switches between different post-processing methods for each epoch based on the consistency check results and data quality metrics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize accuracy for each specific epoch while maintaining overall processing efficiency, rather than using a static Kalman filter approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If forward and backward solutions are directly combined, then the data from two correlated solutions can be combined to enhance raw data output, but the accuracy deteriorates due to ignoring solution consistency and ambiguity distinctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata combinationVSAvoidcombined solution accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism through consistency checks that evaluate the quality and consistency of forward and backward solutions before combination. The system uses ambiguity distinctions and solution consistency metrics to determine whether and how to combine solutions, providing feedback that prevents inaccurate combinations and maintains high accuracy in the final position solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12468048B2Post-processing of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US12468048B2 patent drawing
  • US12468048B2 patent drawing
  • US12468048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A post-processed GNSS solution from raw GNSS data acquired from a vehicle and optionally other sources is dynamically calculated at the epoch level without using a Kalman filter. Instead, a plurality of GNSS processing methods is applied to each epoch in either the forward or backward direction and the most accurate solution for each epoch of the forward generated solution and backward generated solution is combined. The combined post-processed GNSS solution is determined based on which of the GNSS processing methods were used to generate an epoch of the forward solution and a corresponding epoch of the backward solution.