GNSS Solution Separation Monitoring for Multiple Satellite Failure Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to detect multiple simultaneous erroneous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measurements, particularly in scenarios where spoofing affects most or all satellites, and current techniques are inadequate in differentiating between single and multiple satellite failures.

Innovation Solution

A method using solution separation measurement monitoring with Kalman filter residual and state correction monitoring processes to detect multiple erroneous GNSS measurements by computing and comparing residual and state correction magnitudes against predefined or variable thresholds, allowing for the detection of spoofing events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If solution separation technique is used to detect satellite errors, then single satellite errors can be detected and isolated, but multiple satellite failures cannot be differentiated from single satellite errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesatellite error detection capabilityVSAvoidmultiple satellite failure detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the measurement monitoring process into multiple independent monitoring statistics (measurement residual monitoring and state correction monitoring). Each statistic independently evaluates different aspects of measurement consistency, allowing the system to detect both single and multiple satellite failures by analyzing the combined results of these segmented monitoring approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the monitoring parameters from traditional single-statistic approaches to multiple independent statistics with different characteristics. By monitoring both measurement residuals (difference between observed and predicted measurements) and state corrections (adjustments made to the navigation solution), the system gains the ability to differentiate between single and multiple satellite failures through pattern recognition in the monitoring results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If measurement monitoring is performed using single INS/GNSS solution, then processing is simplified, but the ability to detect multiple erroneous measurements is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring process complexityVSAvoidmultiple satellite failure detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring process is segmented into separate independent statistics (measurement residual monitoring and state correction monitoring) that can be computed from the same INS/GNSS solution. This segmentation allows the system to maintain computational efficiency while gaining enhanced detection capability, as each statistic can be independently evaluated without requiring multiple complete solution passes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the monitoring process universal by designing statistics that can detect both single and multiple satellite failures using the same computational framework. The measurement residual and state correction statistics serve multiple detection purposes simultaneously, eliminating the need for separate monitoring systems for different failure scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If pre-update measurement residual screenings are used, then measurement errors can be detected, but detection capability depends on the order of measurement processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement error detectionVSAvoidprocessing order dependency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the monitoring statistics (measurement residuals and state corrections) are computed after the full measurement update process. This feedback approach allows the system to evaluate the overall impact of all measurements on the navigation solution, making the detection process independent of measurement processing order while maintaining high detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If post-update measurement residual screenings are used, then processing order independence is achieved, but spoofing detection capability is reduced due to self-consistent measurement sets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing order independenceVSAvoidspoofing detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the monitoring approach by introducing state correction monitoring in addition to measurement residual monitoring. While measurement residuals alone may not detect self-consistent spoofing, the state corrections (which represent the actual impact on the navigation solution) provide an additional dimension for detection. The combination of these two parameters restores spoofing detection capability while maintaining processing order independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12546901B2GNSS multiple satellite failure detection using solution separation measurement monitoring
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US12546901B2 patent drawing
  • US12546901B2 patent drawing
  • US12546901B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting failure of multiple satellite signals comprises receiving satellite signals in a GNSS receiver; processing the satellite signals in a Kalman filter to produce a navigation solution and sub-solutions; and performing at least one of a residual monitoring process, or a state corrections monitoring process. In the residual monitoring process, for each sub-solution, expected and actual residuals are computed and compared to determine whether the actual residuals are greater than a threshold; multiple erroneous measurements are detected when at least one actual residual is greater than the threshold for each sub-solution. In the state corrections monitoring process, for each sub-solution, an expected and actual magnitude of state corrections are computed and compared to determine whether the actual magnitude of state corrections is greater than a threshold; multiple erroneous measurements are detected when the actual magnitude of state corrections is greater than the threshold for each sub-solution.