Automated Go-Around Maneuver Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting a go-around maneuver in aircraft rely on human analysis of data from sources like ground-based radar and ADS-B, leading to delays and potential missed detections due to human error and distraction.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that analyzes in-flight surveillance information, such as speed and altitude data, to automatically detect go-around maneuvers by identifying specific patterns indicative of the maneuver, enabling immediate action by air traffic controllers and other stakeholders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human analysis is used to detect go-around maneuvers, then the system can interpret complex flight patterns, but detection speed decreases and errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human manual analysis with an automated computer system that processes flight data automatically. The system uses algorithms to detect go-around maneuvers by analyzing patterns in speed, altitude, and other flight parameters, eliminating human reaction time and subjectivity while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors and detects maneuvers autonomously without requiring human intervention during the detection process. The computer system continuously analyzes flight data, identifies patterns indicative of go-around maneuvers, and triggers alerts automatically, allowing the system to serve itself in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated detection systems are implemented, then detection speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is divided into separate functional modules: data collection module (gathering flight information from multiple sources), analysis module (processing data to identify maneuver patterns), and alert module (triggering notifications). This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to achieve high-speed automated detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to detect multiple types of flight maneuvers and anomalies using a unified approach. The same algorithmic framework can identify go-around maneuvers, abnormal descents, and other flight pattern deviations, making the system versatile without requiring separate specialized systems for each detection task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If multiple data sources are integrated, then detection reliability improves, but information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple sources including ground-based radar, ADS-B, and other surveillance systems into a unified data stream. By combining these data sources and processing them through a single analytical framework, the system achieves higher reliability through cross-validation while managing complexity through integrated processing rather than separate analysis pipelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250022380A1In-flight maneuver detection
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 THE BOEING CO
  • US20250022380A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022380A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022380A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure provide systems and methods for in-flight go-around maneuver detection. An example method includes monitoring information associated with a flight path of a first aircraft while the first aircraft is flying. The method further includes detecting a maneuver associated with the flight path in response to one or more criteria associated with the monitored information being satisfied. The method further includes performing one or more actions associated with the second aircraft in response to detecting the maneuver.