GOA Circuit Pull-Down Maintaining Unit for Liquid Crystal Panel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing GOA circuit in liquid crystal panels experiences reliability issues due to a mutually restrained charging condition during the pre-charging process, leading to potential instability and malfunction over time.

Innovation Solution

The redesign of the pull-down maintaining unit in the GOA circuit includes a second transistor that turns off the first transistor in response to an upper-level pre-charging signal before the present-level pre-charging node is pre-charged, ensuring complete disconnection from the low supply voltage wire, thereby preventing unexpected potential changes in the pre-charging node.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the pull-down maintaining unit uses a Darlington inverter configuration with transistors T42 and T54, then the circuit can maintain low potential at the pre-charging node, but the pre-charging node potential is unexpectedly pulled down during pre-charging process due to mutual restraint between charging conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveGOA circuit stabilityVSAvoidpre-charging node potential stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by turning off transistor T42 before the pre-charging process begins. The control signal turning_off_T42 is activated in advance to ensure T42 is completely off before the pre-charging node starts charging, preventing the mutual restraint problem that occurs when T42 is turned off during the charging process. This preliminary action eliminates the unexpected potential pull-down issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by proactively turning off transistor T42 before the pre-charging operation starts. By anticipating the potential conflict between T42's pull-down function and the pre-charging operation, the control signal turning_off_T42 is activated in advance to prevent the harmful mutual restraint effect from occurring in the first place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Stability of the object's composition

If transistor T42 is turned off during the pre-charging process to prevent potential pull-down, then the pre-charging node can be charged properly, but the timing coordination becomes complex and may cause malfunction over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-charging node potential stabilityVSAvoidGOA circuit reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the timing coordination complexity by turning off transistor T42 in advance before the pre-charging process begins, rather than attempting to coordinate its turn-off timing during the charging process. This eliminates the complex timing requirements and potential coordination errors that could lead to malfunction over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the control signals into distinct functional groups: signals for turning off transistors (turning_off_T42, turning_off_T54) are separated from pre-charging signals (pre_charging_signal). This segmentation clarifies the control logic and reduces timing coordination complexity by making the turn-off actions independent preliminary steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Use of energy by moving object

If the pre-charging node is charged to high potential through transistor T11, then the pre-charging function is achieved, but transistor T54 cannot be completely turned on due to insufficient potential, causing T42 to remain partially on and pull down the node potential

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-charging functionVSAvoidtransistor switching completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by turning off transistor T42 before the pre-charging process begins. This eliminates the need for T54 to be completely turned on during pre-charging, as T42 is already off and cannot pull down the node potential. The insufficient potential issue during pre-charging becomes irrelevant since T42 is preemptively disabled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts transistor T42 from the active circuit during the pre-charging process by turning it off. This removes the conflicting pull-down function from the circuit when pre-charging is occurring, allowing T11 to charge the pre-charging node to high potential without the opposing force from T42, regardless of T54's switching state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10627658B2Liquid crystal panel including GOA circuit and driving method thereof
Publication Date: 2020.04.21 TCL CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • US10627658B2 patent drawing
  • US10627658B2 patent drawing
  • US10627658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There provides a liquid crystal panel including a GOA circuit and a driving method thereof, the GOA circuit including a plurality of single-level GOA circuit units that are cascaded, wherein each single-level GOA circuit unit includes a pull-down maintaining unit, the pull-down maintaining unit including a first transistor having a gate connected to a first node, a source connected to a present-level pre-charging node, and a drain connected to a low supply voltage wire; and a second transistor having a gate connected to an upper-level pre-charging node so as to receive a pre-charging signal from the upper-level pre-charging node and a drain connected to the low supply voltage wire, wherein the second transistor is configured to turn off the first transistor in response to an upper level pre-charging signal before the present-level pre-charging node is pre-charged.