Goal Management System Iterative Ranking Algorithm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals face challenges in maintaining a healthy lifestyle due to barriers such as job demands, family constraints, and financial issues, leading to difficulties in achieving and sustaining a balanced diet and regular physical activity, which are correlated with chronic conditions like obesity and Type-2 Diabetes.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for generating personalized and realistic goals through user input, which includes interactive and tailored Action Plans delivered via email, phone, text messaging, and smartphone applications, allowing users to set incremental changes based on immediate feedback and motivational support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a system provides comprehensive goal management with multiple communication channels (email, phone, text, app), then user engagement and motivation improve, but system complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multiple communication channels (email, phone, text messaging, smartphone applications) to deliver goal management services, allowing a single system to serve diverse user preferences and accessibility needs through universal multi-functional communication interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The goal management system is divided into modular components that can operate independently across different communication channels, enabling selective deployment and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the system provides personalized and interactive Action Plans with immediate feedback, then behavior modification effectiveness improves, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior modification effectivenessVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-generates structured Action Plans with embedded feedback mechanisms and goal templates before user interaction, reducing real-time computational requirements while maintaining personalized effectiveness through pre-computed recommendations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements immediate feedback loops that provide users with real-time information about their progress toward goals, reinforcing behavior modification through timely reinforcement while using efficient algorithms to minimize processing overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If the system generates detailed personalized goals through iterative calculation and ranking, then goal realism and achievability improve, but processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegoal precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system focuses computational resources on calculating and ranking only the most critical goals and metrics that have the greatest impact on user outcomes, rather than exhaustively analyzing all possible parameters, thereby achieving sufficient precision with reduced processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts calculation parameters and ranking criteria based on user progress and changing conditions, optimizing the balance between goal precision and processing efficiency by adapting computational intensity to current user needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10719788B2Goal management method and system
Publication Date: 2020.07.21 BLOCK TORIN J
  • US10719788B2 patent drawing
  • US10719788B2 patent drawing
  • US10719788B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of generating a set of goals is presented. The method entails receiving user input that includes items and an input value associated with each of the items. Individual values are assigned to the items based on the input value. The individual values are then summed to generate a total value, and the items are ranked according to the contributions of their respective individual values to the total value. A difference between the total value and a corresponding reference value is determined. The input value that is associated with the highest-ranking item is changed, and the total value and the difference are then recalculated using the changed input value. The process is repeated with the next highest-ranked item and the next until a condition is fulfilled. A goal is defined based on the changed input value of the items at the time the condition is fulfilled.