Goethite Iron Removal in Hydrometallurgy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for removing iron from hydrometallurgical solutions consume large amounts of reducing agents and oxidants, leading to inefficient iron removal and increased operational costs, with challenges in solid-liquid separation and recovery of valuable metals.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the controlled addition of an iron-containing solution to a reactor with pH and temperature management, using a homogenizing distributor to convert ferric iron to goethite without the need for ferric iron-ferrous iron conversion, utilizing a neutralizer like limestone or sodium hydroxide to maintain pH between 2.5 and 4, and oxidants like air or oxygen when necessary, facilitating easy solid-liquid separation and reducing reagent consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reducing agent and oxidizing agent are added to convert ferric iron to ferrous iron and then back to ferric iron for precipitation, then iron removal is achieved, but large amounts of reagents are consumed and reducing slag is generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron removal efficiencyVSAvoidreagent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the unnecessary intermediate conversion steps (ferric iron to ferrous iron and back) from the iron removal process. By directly precipitating ferric iron as goethite without using reducing agents and oxidizing agents for conversion, the method removes the harmful element (excessive reagent consumption) while preserving the core function (iron removal).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the previously harmful effect of direct ferric iron precipitation (colloidal form difficult to separate) into a beneficial outcome by controlling precipitation conditions (pH 2.5-4, temperature 65-100°C) to form goethite with excellent sedimentation and filtering performances, eliminating the need for reagent-based conversion while achieving better solid-liquid separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If direct neutralization is used for hydrolytic precipitation of ferric iron, then iron removal is achieved, but the main product is colloidal iron hydroxide that is difficult to separate from solution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron removal efficiencyVSAvoidsolid-liquid separation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the precipitation parameters from simple neutralization (pH control only) to controlled hydrolysis conditions (pH 2.5-4, temperature 65-100°C). This parameter modification transforms the precipitation product from colloidal iron hydroxide to crystalline goethite, which has superior settleability and filterability, thereby resolving the solid-liquid separation difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent induces a phase transition in the iron precipitation process by controlling conditions to form crystalline goethite instead of amorphous colloidal hydroxide. This phase change from colloidal to crystalline structure fundamentally improves the physical properties of the precipitate, making it easily separable through sedimentation and filtration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

3Ease of operation

If thickener is used for solid-liquid separation of iron hydroxide precipitation, then separation is achieved, but underflow concentration is less than 20% and valuable metals are entrained in underflow ore pulp

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolid-liquid separation capabilityVSAvoidunderflow concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the precipitate formation parameters to produce goethite with superior settling characteristics. The controlled pH (2.5-4) and temperature (65-100°C) conditions create precipitates with better density and settleability, enabling the thickener to achieve underflow concentrations above 35% while minimizing valuable metal entrainment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves high iron removal rates (90-99%) with improved solid-liquid separation, increasing the underflow concentration of the thickener to above 35%, reducing valuable metal entrainment and enhancing the recovery rate of metals except iron, while minimizing reagent use and operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

controlling concentration of the ferric iron in the reactor below 1 g/L, controlling pH of the solution in the reactor to be 2.5 ̃4, the temperature to be 65 ̃100° C., and the reaction duration to be 1 ̃3 hours, performing solid-liquid separation for the solution after reaction, and removing the iron in the iron-containing solution in hydrometallurgy in the form of goethite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 2

controlling pH of the solution in the reactor to be 2.5 ̃4 is achieved by adding neutralizer to the reactor through a second homogenizing distributor. The neutralizer is one or more selected from a group consisting of limestone, lime, magnesium oxide, zinc oxide and sodium hydroxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeutralization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

when the iron-containing solution in hydrometallurgy contains ferrous iron, oxidant is added to the reactor to oxidize ferrous iron to ferric iron; when the iron-containing solution in hydrometallurgy does not contain ferrous iron, it is unnecessary to add oxidant to the reactor. The oxidant is air or oxygen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 4

adding the iron-containing solution in hydrometallurgy into a reactor through a first homogenizing distributor. The first homogenizing distributor is a uniform dispersing device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHomogenization: Stirring

Implementation Method 5

performing solid-liquid separation for the solution after reaction. a thickener for removing the goethite generated in the reactor through solid liquid separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSedimentation: Sedimentation

Data Source

PatentUS11021772B2Method and device for removing iron in iron-containing solution in hydrometallurgy
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 CHINA ENFI ENG CORP
  • US11021772B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses a method and device for removing iron in an iron-containing solution in hydrometallurgy. This method comprises the steps of: adding an iron-containing solution in hydrometallurgy into a reactor through a first homogenizing distributor, controlling concentration of the ferric iron in the reactor below 1 g/L, controlling pH of the solution in the reactor to be 2.5˜4, the temperature to be 65˜100° C., and the reaction duration to be 1˜3 hours, performing solid-liquid separation for the solution after reaction, and removing the iron in the iron-containing solution in hydrometallurgy in the form of goethite.